Conditional Concept Learning and Cognitive Style
- 1 June 1975
- journal article
- research article
- Published by SAGE Publications in Perceptual and Motor Skills
- Vol. 40 (3) , 859-862
- https://doi.org/10.2466/pms.1975.40.3.859
Abstract
It was predicted that (a) Ss with an analytic cognitive style would out-perform Ss with a global cognitive style on compound-cue problems which could be learned by either a conditional rule or a color rule, and (b) global and analytic Ss would perform equally on a single-cue problem which could be solved only by a conditional rule. 36 analytic and 36 global Ss learned one of the two problems. Analysis showed that analytic Ss performed significantly better than global Ss only on the compound-cue problem. The results suggested that the better performance of analytic Ss is limited to problems which require some degree of stimulus differentiation. It was further suggested that additional research on hypothesis-testing might help clarify the differences in performance between analytic and global Ss.Keywords
This publication has 5 references indexed in Scilit:
- Relationship of Field Independence and Dogmatism with an Hierarchically Arranged Concept Learning TaskPerceptual and Motor Skills, 1972
- Cognitive style and concept identification as a function of complexity and training procedures.Journal of Educational Psychology, 1970
- Field Independence in Concept AttainmentPerceptual and Motor Skills, 1968
- Effects of Field Independence and Dogmatism on Reversal and Nonreversal Shifts in Concept FormationPerceptual and Motor Skills, 1966
- The nature of the response in discrimination learning.Psychological Review, 1952