Testing for a mass extinction without selecting taxa
- 1 January 2000
- journal article
- Published by Cambridge University Press (CUP) in Paleobiology
- Vol. 26 (4) , 647-650
- https://doi.org/10.1666/0094-8373(2000)026<0647:tfamew>2.0.co;2
Abstract
Statistical inference about mass extinction events is commonly based on the pattern of fossil finds among a group of taxa. An important issue for existing methods is the selection of taxa for inclusion in the analysis. A common approach is to select taxa on the basis of the stratigraphic height of their uppermost finds. This approach creates a bias in favor of detecting a mass extinction event. This paper describes and illustrates an approach that avoids this problem.Keywords
This publication has 11 references indexed in Scilit:
- The Uncertainty in the True End Point of a Fossil's Stratigraphic Range When Stratigraphic Sections Are Sampled DiscretelyMathematical Geology, 1999
- On fossil preservation and the stratigraphic ranges of taxaPaleobiology, 1997
- Sudden and Gradual Molluscan Extinctions in the Latest Cretaceous of Western European TethysScience, 1996
- Fossil preservation and the stratigraphic ranges of taxaPaleobiology, 1996
- Tests and confidence intervals for a common upper endpoint in fossil taxaPaleobiology, 1996
- Distinguishing between sudden and gradual extinctions in the fossil record: Predicting the position of the Cretaceous-Tertiary iridium anomaly using the ammonite fossil record on Seymour Island, AntarcticaGeology, 1995
- An Introduction to the BootstrapPublished by Springer Nature ,1993
- Confidence intervals on stratigraphic rangesPaleobiology, 1990
- The effect of random range truncations on patterns of evolution in the fossil recordPaleobiology, 1990
- Late Campanian–Maastrichtian Ammonite Fauna from Seymour Island (Antarctic Peninsula)Journal of Paleontology, 1986