Fossil preservation and the stratigraphic ranges of taxa
- 1 January 1996
- journal article
- research article
- Published by Cambridge University Press (CUP) in Paleobiology
- Vol. 22 (2) , 121-140
- https://doi.org/10.1017/s0094837300016134
Abstract
The incompleteness of the fossil record hinders the inference of evolutionary rates and patterns. Here, we derive relationships among true taxonomic durations, preservation probability, and observed taxonomic ranges. We use these relationships to estimate original distributions of taxonomic durations, preservation probability, and completeness (proportion of taxa preserved), given only the observed ranges. No data on occurrences within the ranges of taxa are required. When preservation is random and the original distribution of durations is exponential, the inference of durations, preservability, and completeness is exact. However, reasonable approximations are possible given non-exponential duration distributions and temporal and taxonomic variation in preservability. Thus, the approaches we describe have great potential in studies of taphonomy, evolutionary rates and patterns, and genealogy.Analyses of Upper Cambrian-Lower Ordovician trilobite species, Paleozoic crinoid genera, Jurassic bivalve species, and Cenozoic mammal species yield the following results: (1) The preservation probability inferred from stratigraphic ranges alone agrees with that inferred from the analysis of stratigraphic gaps when data on the latter are available. (2) Whereas median durations based on simple tabulations of observed ranges are biased by stratigraphic resolution, our estimates of median duration, extinction rate, and completeness are not biased. (3) The shorter geologic ranges of mammalian species relative to those of bivalves cannot be attributed to a difference in preservation potential. However, we cannot rule out the contribution of taxonomic practice to this difference. (4) In the groups studied, completeness (proportion of species [trilobites, bivalves, mammals] or genera [crinoids] preserved) ranges from 60% to 90%. The higher estimates of completeness at smaller geographic scales support previous suggestions that the incompleteness of the fossil record reflects loss of fossiliferous rock more than failure of species to enter the fossil record in the first place.Keywords
This publication has 32 references indexed in Scilit:
- Confidence intervals on stratigraphic ranges: partial relaxation of the assumption of randomly distributed fossil horizonsPaleobiology, 1994
- Calibrating Rates of Early Cambrian EvolutionScience, 1993
- Counting dinosaurs: how many kinds were there?Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, 1990
- Classical confidence intervals and Bayesian probability estimates for ends of local taxon rangesMathematical Geology, 1989
- Fossil Record of the Origin of Baupläne and Its ImplicationsPublished by Springer Nature ,1986
- Three new Upper Cambrian stages for North AmericaGeology, 1985
- Stratigraphic distribution and ecology of European Jurassic bivalvesLethaia, 1976
- Stratigraphic biases in the analysis of taxonomic survivorshipPaleobiology, 1975
- Taxonomic survivorship curves and Van Valen's LawPaleobiology, 1975
- Bibliographic and Faunal Index of Paleozoic Pelmatozoan EchinodermsPublished by Geological Society of America ,1943