The Advantage of Timely Intervention.
- 1 January 2004
- journal article
- Published by American Psychological Association (APA) in Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition
- Vol. 30 (4) , 856-876
- https://doi.org/10.1037/0278-7393.30.4.856
Abstract
Can people learn causal structure more effectively through intervention rather than observation? Four studies used a trial-based learning paradigm in which participants obtained probabilistic data about a causal chain through either observation or intervention and then selected the causal model most likely to have generated the data. Experiment 1 demonstrated that interveners made more correct model choices than did observers, and Experiments 2 and 3 ruled out explanations for this advantage in terms of informational differences between the 2 conditions. Experiment 4 tested the hypothesis that the advantage was driven by a temporal signal; interveners may exploit the cue that their interventions are the most likely causes of any subsequent changes. Results supported this temporal cue hypothesis.Keywords
This publication has 21 references indexed in Scilit:
- A Theory of Causal Learning in Children: Causal Maps and Bayes Nets.Psychological Review, 2004
- Reply to RobertsonPhilosophical Papers, 2003
- Inferring causal networks from observations and interventionsCognitive Science, 2003
- SPIGGIN: A STICKY TOXICITY INDICATORJournal of Experimental Biology, 2003
- Knowledge mediates the timeframe of covariation assessment in human causal inductionThinking & Reasoning, 2002
- Security and management policy specificationIEEE Network, 2002
- Time, rate, and conditioning.Psychological Review, 2000
- The empirical case for two systems of reasoning.Psychological Bulletin, 1996
- Is Human Learning Rational?The Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology Section A, 1995
- Human contingency judgments: Rule based or associative?Psychological Bulletin, 1993