Can unorthodox cancer therapy improve quality-of-life?
- 1 February 1993
- journal article
- research article
- Published by Elsevier in Annals of Oncology
- Vol. 4 (2) , 121-123
- https://doi.org/10.1093/oxfordjournals.annonc.a058413
Abstract
The introduction of a psychosocial component into quality-of-life scores in cancer patients means that any belief which increases hope of cure on benefit will improve the score, and may override adverse physical components of the measurement. Such a belief may be the denial of a bad prognosis by some patients. There can be no objection to the patient seeking the temporary reassurance which may come from unorthodox therapies, as long as they are harmless and do not interfere with orthodox therapy. They may give the patient with a bad prognosis the necessary time to develop inner strengths enabling him to come to terms with the situationKeywords
This publication has 10 references indexed in Scilit:
- Are alternative cancer therapies gaining adherents in Europe?Annals of Oncology, 1992
- EFFECT OF PSYCHOSOCIAL TREATMENT ON SURVIVAL OF PATIENTS WITH METASTATIC BREAST CANCERThe Lancet, 1989
- Best medical practice: The case of JapanThe International Journal of Health Planning and Management, 1989
- The social implications of questionable cancer therapiesCancer, 1989
- Who should measure quality of life, the doctor or the patient?British Journal of Cancer, 1988
- Improving the Quality of Life during Chemotherapy for Advanced Breast CancerNew England Journal of Medicine, 1987
- Quality of lifeCancer, 1987
- Quality of life in cancer patients--an hypothesis.Journal of Medical Ethics, 1984
- Reaction to a diagnosis of breast cancer relationship between denial, delay and rates of psychological morbidityCancer, 1984
- The Hospital Anxiety and Depression ScaleActa Psychiatrica Scandinavica, 1983