Effect of Clinical Risk Stratification on Cost-Effectiveness of the Implantable Cardioverter-Defibrillator
- 2 October 2001
- journal article
- other
- Published by Wolters Kluwer Health in Circulation
- Vol. 104 (14) , 1622-1626
- https://doi.org/10.1161/hc3901.096720
Abstract
Background Three randomized clinical trials showed that implantable cardioverter-defibrillators (ICDs) reduce the risk of death in survivors of ventricular tachyarrhythmias, but the cost per year of life gained is high. A substudy of the Canadian Implantable Defibrillator Study (CIDS) showed that 3 clinical factors, age ≥70 years, left ventricular ejection fraction ≤35%, and New York Heart Association class III, predicted the risk of death and benefit from the ICD. We estimated the extent to which selecting patients for ICD therapy based on these risk factors makes ICD therapy more economically attractive. Methods and Results Patients in CIDS were grouped according to whether they had ≥2 of 3 risk factors. Incremental cost-effectiveness of ICD therapy was computed as the ratio of the difference in mean cost to the difference in life expectancy between the 2 groups. Over 6.3 years, the mean cost per patient in the ICD group was Canadian (C) $87 715 versus $38 600 in the amiodarone group (C$1≈US$0.67). Life expectancy for the ICD group was 4.58 years versus 4.35 years for amiodarone, for an incremental cost-effectiveness of ICD therapy of C$213 543 per life-year gained. The cost per life-year gained in patients with ≥2 factors was C$65 195, compared with C$916 659 with Conclusions The cost-effectiveness of ICD therapy varies by patient risk factor status. The use of ICD therapy in patients who have ≥2 risk factors of age ≥70 years, left ventricular ejection fraction ≤35%, and NYHA class III is C$65 195 to gain a year of life.Keywords
This publication has 16 references indexed in Scilit:
- Do baseline characteristics accurately discriminate between patients likely versus unlikely to benefit from implantable defibrillator therapy?American Heart Journal, 2001
- Meta-analysis of the implantable cardioverter defibrillator secondary prevention trialsEuropean Heart Journal, 2000
- Relative effectiveness of the implantable cardioverter-defibrillator and antiarrhythmic drugs in patients with varying degrees of left ventricular dysfunction who have survived malignant ventricular arrhythmiasJournal of the American College of Cardiology, 1999
- The (Near) Equivalence of Cost-Effectiveness and Cost-Benefit AnalysesPharmacoEconomics, 1998
- Improved Survival with an Implanted Defibrillator in Patients with Coronary Disease at High Risk for Ventricular ArrhythmiaNew England Journal of Medicine, 1996
- Cost-effectiveness analysis in heart disease, part III: Ischemia, congestive heart failure, and arrhythmiasProgress in Cardiovascular Diseases, 1995
- Cost-effectiveness of HMG-CoA Reductase Inhibition for Primary and Secondary Prevention of Coronary Heart DiseasePublished by American Medical Association (AMA) ,1991
- Screening for HypertensionAnnals of Internal Medicine, 1990
- Bootstrap Methods: Another Look at the JackknifeThe Annals of Statistics, 1979
- Nonparametric Estimation from Incomplete ObservationsJournal of the American Statistical Association, 1958