Two Adaptable, Valid, and Reliable Data-Collection Measures
- 1 April 1988
- journal article
- Published by SAGE Publications in The Counseling Psychologist
- Vol. 16 (2) , 261-271
- https://doi.org/10.1177/0011000088162007
Abstract
Finding an appropriate, statistically sound means of collecting data is an important step in developing research. Researchers in counseling psychology have recently been criticized for studies unrelated to actual practice. Goal attainment scaling and the semantic differential are presented as two flexible, reliable, and valid data-collection methodologies useful for practitioners. Procedural instructions and examples for constructing each instrument are provided. A short history of the two instruments is presented, along with a discussion of the specific type of research most appropriate for each methodology.Keywords
This publication has 23 references indexed in Scilit:
- Reliability and Construct Validity of the Learning Style QuestionnaireEducational and Psychological Measurement, 1986
- Analyzing patterns and sequence in counseling: Reactions of a counseling process researcher.Journal of Counseling Psychology, 1986
- An Exploration of Health Counseling and Goal Attainment Scaling in Health Education ProgramsJournal of School Health, 1984
- Reexamining guiding assumptions: Theoretical and methodological implications.Journal of Counseling Psychology, 1984
- A modest proposal for a revision of strategies for counseling research.Journal of Counseling Psychology, 1984
- Special Section: Philosophy of Science and Counseling Research: Editor's Introduction.Journal of Counseling Psychology, 1984
- Evaluating the individual counseling of conduct problem adolescents: The goal attainment scaling methodJournal of School Psychology, 1984
- Goal attainment, locus of control, and coping style in adolescent group counseling.Journal of Counseling Psychology, 1978
- Multidimensional perception of counselor behavior.Journal of Counseling Psychology, 1975
- Goal attainment scaling: A general method for evaluating comprehensive community mental health programsCommunity Mental Health Journal, 1968