Comparison of methods of microvascular staining and quantification in prostate carcinoma: Relevance to prognosis
- 1 February 2002
- Vol. 110 (2) , 177-185
- https://doi.org/10.1034/j.1600-0463.2002.100209.x
Abstract
No abstract availableKeywords
This publication has 14 references indexed in Scilit:
- Patterns of angiogenesis in nonsmall-cell lung carcinomaCancer, 2001
- CD34 IMMUNOHISTOCHEMICAL ASSESSMENT OF ANGIOGENESIS AS A PROGNOSTIC MARKER FOR PROSTATE CANCER RECURRENCE AFTER RADICAL PROSTATECTOMYJournal of Urology, 1998
- Association between in vivo iododeoxyuridine labeling, MIB‐1 expression, malignancy grade and clinical stage in human prostate cancerAPMIS, 1998
- Examining the technique of angiogenesis assessment in invasive breast cancerBritish Journal of Cancer, 1997
- Tumor angiogenesis correlates with progression after radical prostatectomy but not with pathologic stage in gleason sum 5 to 7 adenocarcinoma of the prostateCancer, 1997
- Influence of investigator experience and microscopic field size on microvessel density in node-negative breast carcinomaBreast Cancer Research and Treatment, 1997
- QBEND/10, a new monoclonal antibody to endothelium: assessment of its diagnostic utility in paraffin sectionsHistopathology, 1990
- STATISTICAL METHODS FOR ASSESSING AGREEMENT BETWEEN TWO METHODS OF CLINICAL MEASUREMENTThe Lancet, 1986
- Biosynthesis of von Willebrand protein by human megakaryocytes.Journal of Clinical Investigation, 1985
- Transplacental Carcinogenesis by StilbestrolNew England Journal of Medicine, 1971