Influence of investigator experience and microscopic field size on microvessel density in node-negative breast carcinoma
- 1 January 1997
- journal article
- Published by Springer Nature in Breast Cancer Research and Treatment
- Vol. 42 (2) , 165-172
- https://doi.org/10.1023/a:1005737524541
Abstract
In this study on the determination of intratumoralmicrovessel density (MVD) in breast cancer, we haveinvestigated the influence of the observer experience andthe microscopic field size. We have used thesample set reported on earlier in the JNatl Cancer Inst 87: 1797–1798, 1995. This case-controlstudy has shown a positive association of highMVD and unfavorable outcome when comparing node-negative pT1–2breast carcinoma (NNBC) patients with a disease-free periodof over ten years with those with anearly distant relapse.Tumor sections of both outcome groups (favorable: n= 19; unfavorable: n = 19) were immunostainedfor factor VIII related-antigen (FVIII r-Ag). Microvessels werecounted in the areas of most intense vascularization(‘hot spots’), both at magnification × 200 (fieldsize of 0.61 square mm) and × 400(field size of 0.15 square mm), by oneinexperienced and three experienced observers. Microphotographs of individualvascular hot spots were analyzed using overlays resemblingthe two field sizes.The main results obtained are: i) a confirmationof the prognostic value of microvessel density inthe case-control sample set (n = 38) wasestablished by all experienced but not by theunexperienced investigator; ii) both at × 200 and× 400 magnification, angiogenesis quantification in vascular hotspots contained prognostic information.The results of this study indicate that theselection of vascular hot spots in tumor sectionsimmunostained for an antigen expressed on endothelial cellsis more prone to inter-observer variability and moredependent on training than the counting of themicrovessels within predefined hot spots itself. The microscopicmagnification and resulting field size do not influencethe prognostic significance of MVD in NNBC. Thisinformation validates the development of more objective methodsof measuring the amount of angiogenesis within malignanttissue. This will allow more accurate implementation ofthe angiogenesis parameter in multiparametric and prospective prognosticfactor studies in NNBC.Keywords
This publication has 30 references indexed in Scilit:
- Re: Tumor Angiogenesis as a Prognostic Assay for Invasive Ductal Breast CarcinomaJNCI Journal of the National Cancer Institute, 1995
- Prognostic significance of microvessel density in lymph node negative breast carcinomaHuman Pathology, 1995
- Association between tumour angiogenesis and tumour cell shedding into effluent venous blood during breast cancer surgeryThe Lancet, 1995
- Microvessel density and vessel invasion in lymph‐node‐negative breast cancer: Effect on recurrence‐free survivalInternational Journal of Cancer, 1995
- Microvessel quantitation in invasive breast cancer by staining for factor VIII-related antigenBritish Journal of Cancer, 1995
- Microvessel quantification in primary colorectal carcinoma: an immunohistochemical studyBritish Journal of Cancer, 1995
- Evaluating the Potential Usefulness of New Prognostic and Predictive Indicators on Node-Negative Breast Cancer PatientsJNCI Journal of the National Cancer Institute, 1993
- Vascular endothelial growth factor induced by hypoxia may mediate hypoxia-initiated angiogenesisNature, 1992
- Tumor Angiogenesis and Metastasis — Correlation in Invasive Breast CarcinomaNew England Journal of Medicine, 1991
- Induction of angiogenesis during the transition from hyperplasia to neoplasiaNature, 1989