Does Investor Misvaluation Drive the Takeover Market?
Top Cited Papers
- 9 March 2006
- journal article
- Published by Wiley in The Journal of Finance
- Vol. 61 (2) , 725-762
- https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1540-6261.2006.00853.x
Abstract
This paper uses pre‐offer market valuations to evaluate the misvaluation and Q theories of takeovers. Bidder and target valuations (price‐to‐book, or price‐to‐residual‐income‐model‐value) are related to means of payment, mode of acquisition, premia, target hostility, offer success, and bidder and target announcement‐period returns. The evidence is broadly consistent with both hypotheses. The evidence for the Q hypothesis is stronger in the pre‐1990 period than in the 1990–2000 period, whereas the evidence for the misvaluation hypothesis is stronger in the 1990–2000 period than in the pre‐1990 period.Keywords
All Related Versions
This publication has 63 references indexed in Scilit:
- Book‐to‐Market Equity, Distress Risk, and Stock ReturnsThe Journal of Finance, 2002
- Market Timing and Capital StructureThe Journal of Finance, 2002
- Timing, investment opportunities, managerial discretion, and the security issue decisionPublished by Elsevier ,1999
- Returns to contrarian investment strategies: Tests of naive expectations hypothesesJournal of Financial Economics, 1997
- Multifactor Explanations of Asset Pricing AnomaliesThe Journal of Finance, 1996
- The New Issues PuzzleThe Journal of Finance, 1995
- Contrarian Investment, Extrapolation, and RiskThe Journal of Finance, 1994
- The Long‐Run Performance of initial Public OfferingsThe Journal of Finance, 1991
- Determinants of Tender Offer PremiumsCFA Magazine, 1985
- Corporate financing and investment decisions when firms have information that investors do not haveJournal of Financial Economics, 1984