Cytofluorometric methods for assessing absolute numbers of cell subsets in blood
Top Cited Papers
Open Access
- 15 December 2000
- Vol. 42 (6) , 327-346
- https://doi.org/10.1002/1097-0320(20001215)42:6<327::aid-cyto1000>3.0.co;2-f
Abstract
The enumeration of absolute levels of cells and their subsets in clinical samples is of primary importance in human immunodeficiency virus (HIV)+ individuals (CD4+ T‐ lymphocyte enumeration), in patients who are candidates for autotransplantation (CD34+ hematopoietic progenitor cells), and in evaluating leukoreduced blood products (residual white blood cells). These measurements share a number of technical options, namely, single‐ or multiple‐color cell staining and logical gating strategies. These can be accomplished using single‐ or dual‐platform counting technologies employing cytometric methods. Dual‐platform counting technologies couple the percentage of positive cell subsets obtained by cytometry and the absolute cell count obtained by automated hematology analyzers to derive the absolute value of such subsets. Despite having many conceptual and technical limitations, this approach is traditionally considered as the reference method for absolute cell count enumeration. As a result, the development of single‐platform technologies has recently attracted attention with several different technical approaches now being readily available. These single‐platform approaches have less sources of variability. A number of reports clearly demonstrate that they provide better coefficients of variation (CVs) in multicenter studies and a lower chance to generate aberrant results. These methods are therefore candidates for the new gold standard for absolute cell assessments. The currently available technical options are discussed in this review together with the results of some cross‐comparative studies. Each analytical system has its own specific requirements as far as the dispensing precision steps are concerned. The importance of precision reverse pipetting is emphasized. Issues still under development include the establishment of the critical error ranges, which are different in each test setting, and the applicability of simplified low‐cost techniques to be used in countries with limited resources. Cytometry (Comm. Clin. Cytometry) 42:327–346, 2000.Keywords
This publication has 164 references indexed in Scilit:
- Very large amounts of peripheral blood progenitor cells eliminate severe thrombocytopenia after high-dose melphalan in advanced breast cancer patientsBone Marrow Transplantation, 1999
- Discontinuation of Primary Prophylaxis againstPneumocystis cariniiPneumonia in HIV-1–Infected Adults Treated with Combination Antiretroviral TherapyNew England Journal of Medicine, 1999
- Demonstration by Flow Cytometry of the Numbers of Residual White Blood Cells and Platelets in Filtered Red Blood Cell Concentrates and Plasma PreparationsVox Sanguinis, 1997
- Longitudinal Analysis of CD4 T Cell Counts, T Cell Reactivity, and Human Immunodeficiency Virus Type 1 RNA Levels in Persons Remaining AIDS‐Free despite CD4 Cell Counts < 200 for >5 YearsThe Journal of Infectious Diseases, 1997
- T Lymphocyte Subpopulations in Anorexia Nervosa and RefeedingClinical Immunology and Immunopathology, 1997
- Automatic volumetric capillary cytometry for counting white cells in white cell‐reduced plateletpheresis componentsTransfusion, 1997
- Determination of CD4+ and CD8+ Lymphocytes with the Cytosphere Assay: A Comparative Study with Flow Cytometry and the Immunoalkaline Phosphatase MethodClinical Immunology and Immunopathology, 1995
- Assessment of the Effects of Instrumentation, Monoclonal Antibody, and Fluorochrome on Flow Cytometric Immunophenotyping: A Report Based on 2 Years of the NIAID DAIDS Flow Cytometry Quality Assessment ProgramClinical Immunology and Immunopathology, 1993
- STATISTICAL METHODS FOR ASSESSING AGREEMENT BETWEEN TWO METHODS OF CLINICAL MEASUREMENTThe Lancet, 1986
- Quantitation of cell concentration using the flow cytometerCytometry, 1982