Decision boundaries and receiver operating characteristic curves: New methods for determining accelerometer cutpoints
- 1 May 2007
- journal article
- research article
- Published by Taylor & Francis in Journal of Sports Sciences
- Vol. 25 (8) , 937-944
- https://doi.org/10.1080/02640410600908027
Abstract
We propose and evaluate the utility of an alternative method (decision boundaries) for establishing physical activity intensity-related accelerometer cutpoints. Accelerometer data collected from seventy-six 11- to 14-year-old boys during controlled bouts of moderate- and vigorous-intensity field physical activities were assessed. Mean values and standard deviations for moderate- and vigorous-intensity activities were obtained and normal equivalents generated. The decision boundary (the point of intersection of overlapping distributions) was used to create a lower-bound vigorous-intensity cutpoint. Receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curves compared the sensitivity and specificity of the new cutpoint and mean values with the actual activity. There was a 96.5% probability that participants performing vigorous-intensity physical activity were accurately classified when using the decision boundary of 6700 counts per minute, in contrast to the 50% accurately classified when the mean value was used. Inspection of the empirical ROC curve indicated that the decision boundary provided the optimal threshold to distinguish between moderate and vigorous physical activity for this dataset. In conclusion, decision boundaries reduced the error associated with determining accelerometer threshold values. Applying these methods to accelerometer data collected in specific populations will improve the precision with which accelerometer thresholds can be identified.Keywords
This publication has 27 references indexed in Scilit:
- Effects of a 12-month physical activity counselling intervention on glycaemic control and on the status of cardiovascular risk factors in people with Type 2 diabetesDiabetologia, 2004
- Predicting Energy Expenditure of Physical Activity Using Hip- and Wrist-Worn AccelerometersDiabetes Technology & Therapeutics, 2003
- Reexamination of Validity and Reliability of the CSA Monitor in Walking and RunningMedicine & Science in Sports & Exercise, 2003
- Is the ArteACC Index a Valid Indicator of Free‐Living Physical Activity in Adolescents?Obesity Research, 2003
- Multicomponent Cross-Validation of Minimum Weight Predictions for College WrestlersMedicine & Science in Sports & Exercise, 2003
- Compliance with Physical Activity Guidelines Prevalence in a Population of Children and YouthAnnals of Epidemiology, 2002
- Validation and Calibration of Physical Activity Monitors in ChildrenObesity Research, 2002
- Physical activity assessed by activity monitor and doubly labeled water in childrenMedicine & Science in Sports & Exercise, 2001
- Assessment of Physical Activity with the Computer Science and Applications, Inc., Accelerometer: Laboratory versus Field ValidationResearch Quarterly for Exercise and Sport, 2000
- STATISTICAL METHODS FOR ASSESSING AGREEMENT BETWEEN TWO METHODS OF CLINICAL MEASUREMENTThe Lancet, 1986