Unusualness and Threat as Possible Causes of "Weapon Focus"
- 1 May 1998
- journal article
- research article
- Published by Taylor & Francis in Memory
- Vol. 6 (3) , 277-295
- https://doi.org/10.1080/741942361
Abstract
In two experiments exploring possible causes of the “weapon focus” effect, undergraduates viewed videotapes depicting interactions in business establishments. The target character was either empty-handed or held different objects that varied in both threat and unusualness. Witnesses attempted to describe the target's features and clothing, identify the object held by him (if any), and identify him in a photo line-up. The accuracy of witnesses' descriptions was affected by unusualness but not threat. Identification accuracy did not differ by condition. Witnesses had difficulty remembering the low-threat, non-unusual object; many either failed to identify it (Experiment 1) or reported seeing no object (Experiment 2). The results of both experiments imply that weapon focus, when it occurs, may do so because weapons are unexpected.Keywords
This publication has 13 references indexed in Scilit:
- Sex Differences, Weapon Focus, and Eyewitness ReliabilityThe Journal of Social Psychology, 1994
- Actual victims and witnesses to robbery and fraud: An archival analysisPublished by Cambridge University Press (CUP) ,1994
- A meta-analytic review of the weapon focus effect.Law and Human Behavior, 1992
- Emotional stress and eyewitness memory: A critical review.Psychological Bulletin, 1992
- Weapon focus, arousal, and eyewitness memory: Attention must be paid.Law and Human Behavior, 1990
- Eyewitness identification: Simulating the "weapon effect."Law and Human Behavior, 1989
- Some facts about "weapon focus."Law and Human Behavior, 1987
- The reliability of eyewitness identification: The role of system and estimator variables.Law and Human Behavior, 1987
- Cognitive determinants of fixation location during picture viewing.Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance, 1978
- The effect of emotion on cue utilization and the organization of behavior.Psychological Review, 1959