Direct Manipulation Interfaces
- 1 December 1985
- journal article
- Published by Taylor & Francis in Human–Computer Interaction
- Vol. 1 (4) , 311-338
- https://doi.org/10.1207/s15327051hci0104_2
Abstract
Direct manipulation has been lauded as a good form of interface design, and some interfaces that have this property have been well received by users. In this article we seek a cognitive account of both the advantages and disadvantages of direct manipulation interfaces. We identify two underlying phenomena that give rise to the feeling of directness. One deals with the information processing distance between the user's intentions and the facilities provided by the machine. Reduction of this distance makes the interface feel direct by reducing the effort required of the user to accomplish goals. The second phenomenon concerns the relation between the input and output vocabularies of the interface language. In particular, direct manipulation requires that the system provide representations of objects that behave as if they are the objects themselves. This provides the feeling of directness of manipulation.Keywords
This publication has 11 references indexed in Scilit:
- User Centered System DesignPublished by Taylor & Francis ,1986
- A Principled Design for an Integrated Computational EnvironmentHuman–Computer Interaction, 1985
- Computer SoftwareScientific American, 1984
- Manipulating simulated objects with real-world gestures using a force and position sensitive screenACM SIGGRAPH Computer Graphics, 1984
- Direct Manipulation: A Step Beyond Programming LanguagesComputer, 1983
- Special Feature: Epigrams on programmingACM SIGPLAN Notices, 1982
- Learning and remembering command namesPublished by Association for Computing Machinery (ACM) ,1982
- An invited article Facilitating human–computer communicationApplied Psycholinguistics, 1981
- A Computer Graphics System for PolynomialsThe Mathematics Teacher, 1974
- Arithmetic by smell.Psychological Review, 1894