The Marketing Battle Over Genetically Modified Foods
- 1 April 2001
- journal article
- research article
- Published by SAGE Publications in American Behavioral Scientist
- Vol. 44 (8) , 1405-1417
- https://doi.org/10.1177/00027640121956755
Abstract
Although proponents assume that good science sells and that the biotechnology issue will soon become a nonissue, opponents of biotechnology assume that consumers want to be informed and that the risks of the unknown are more important than benefits. Using current models of consumer behavior, this article examines eight incorrect assumptions about consumers. Understanding the processing style of consumers and how it influences their attitudes suggests changes that both opponents and proponents can make to educate consumers more effectively.Keywords
This publication has 12 references indexed in Scilit:
- A Benefit Congruency Framework of Sales Promotion EffectivenessJournal of Marketing, 2000
- Consumers and Biotechnology: A Synopsis of Survey and Focus Group ResearchJournal of Consumer Policy, 1998
- Consumers' Decision-Making and Risk Perceptions Regarding Foods Produced with BiotechnologyJournal of Consumer Policy, 1998
- Information-Based Principles for Rethinking Consumer Protection PolicyJournal of Consumer Policy, 1998
- The influence of realistic product exposure on attitudes towards genetic engineering of foodFood Quality and Preference, 1996
- Consumer acceptability of genetically modified foods with special reference to farmed salmonBritish Food Journal, 1996
- Advertising Strategies to Increase Usage FrequencyJournal of Marketing, 1996
- Genetic engineering and food: what determines consumer acceptance?British Food Journal, 1995
- Gene technology, food production, and public opinion: A UK studyAgriculture and Human Values, 1994
- Ethics in bioengineeringJournal of Business Ethics, 1990