Optimal classification of protein sequences and selection of representative sets from multiple alignments: application to homologous families and lessons for structural genomics
Open Access
- 1 April 2001
- journal article
- research article
- Published by Oxford University Press (OUP) in Protein Engineering, Design and Selection
- Vol. 14 (4) , 209-217
- https://doi.org/10.1093/protein/14.4.209
Abstract
Hierarchical classification is probably the most popular approach to group-related proteins. However, there are a number of problems associated with its use for this purpose. One is that the resulting tree showing a nested sequence of groups may not be the most suitable representation of the data. Another is that visual inspection is the most common method to decide the most appropriate number of subsets from a tree. In fact, classification of proteins in general is bedevilled with the need for subjective thresholds to define group membership (e.g. `significant' sequence identity for homologous families). Such arbitrariness is not only intellectually unsatisfying but also has important practical consequences. For instance, it hinders meaningful identification of protein targets for structural genomics. I describe an alternative approach to cluster-related proteins without the need for an a priori threshold, first, through its use of dynamic programming, which is guaranteed to produce globally optimal solutions at all levels of partition granularity. Grouping proteins according to weights assigned to their aligned sequences makes it possible to delineate dynamically a `core–periphery' structure within families. The `core' of a protein family comprises the most typical sequences while the `periphery' consists of the atypical ones. Further, a new sequence weighting scheme that combines the information in all the multiply aligned positions of an alignment in a novel way is put forward. Instead of averaging over all positions, this procedure takes into account directly the distribution of sequence variability along an alignment. The relationships between sequence weights and sequence identity are investigated for 168 families taken from HOMSTRAD, a database of protein structure alignments for homologous families. An exact solution is presented for the problem of how to select the most representative pair of sequences for a protein family. Extension of this approach by a greedy algorithm allows automatic identification of a minimal set of aligned sequences. The results of this analysis are available on the Web at http://mathbio.nimr.mrc.ac.uk/~amay.Keywords
This publication has 45 references indexed in Scilit:
- Position-based sequence weightsPublished by Elsevier ,2004
- Biosequence ExegesisScience, 1999
- Universally conserved positions in protein folds: reading evolutionary signals about stability, folding kinetics and functionJournal of Molecular Biology, 1999
- Non-functional conserved residues in globins and their possible role as a folding nucleus 1 1Edited by F. E. CohenJournal of Molecular Biology, 1999
- CATH – a hierarchic classification of protein domain structuresPublished by Elsevier ,1997
- An Evolutionary Trace Method Defines Binding Surfaces Common to Protein FamiliesJournal of Molecular Biology, 1996
- Volume changes in protein evolutionJournal of Molecular Biology, 1994
- Selection of representative protein data setsProtein Science, 1992
- Weighting aligned protein or nucleic acid sequences to correct for unequal representationJournal of Molecular Biology, 1990
- Knowledge-based prediction of protein structures and the design of novel moleculesNature, 1987