The nature and measurement of stress
- 1 August 1985
- journal article
- research article
- Published by Taylor & Francis in Ergonomics
- Vol. 28 (8) , 1155-1163
- https://doi.org/10.1080/00140138508963238
Abstract
This paper considers why asking what physiological measures of stress there are is not a sensible question. In so doing, it examines the nature of stress as described by contemporary theories and explores their implications for measurement. It concludes that there cannot be direct physiological measures of stress, only physiological correlates. The measurement of stress must focus on the individual' s psychological state, as related to their perception of the environment and emotional reaction to it ( mood). In discussing the question of measurement, the paper introduces the issues of reliability, validity and fairness, and emphasizes that they should be raised in relation to all types of measure, not just those that are subjectiveKeywords
This publication has 14 references indexed in Scilit:
- The measurement of self‐reported stress and arousalBritish Journal of Psychology, 1985
- A stress and arousal mood scale for low vocabulary subjects: A reworking of Mackay et al. (1978)British Journal of Psychology, 1984
- Measurement of stress and arousal: Validation of the stress/arousal adjective checklistBritish Journal of Psychology, 1983
- The relation of social to biological processes in diseaseSocial Science & Medicine, 1982
- Stress arousal and coping with surgeryPsychological Medicine, 1981
- A circumplex model of affect.Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 1980
- Job Demands, Job Decision Latitude, and Mental Strain: Implications for Job RedesignAdministrative Science Quarterly, 1979
- Affective space is bipolar.Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 1979
- An inventory for the measurement of self‐reported stress and arousalBritish Journal of Social and Clinical Psychology, 1978
- The measurement of stress in a sales training situationJournal of Occupational Psychology, 1977