Seven-Year Efficacy of a Lopinavir/Ritonavir-Based Regimen in Antiretroviral—Naïve HIV-1-Infected Patients
- 1 February 2008
- journal article
- research article
- Published by Taylor & Francis in HIV Research & Clinical Practice
- Vol. 9 (1) , 1-10
- https://doi.org/10.1310/hct0901-1
Abstract
Objective: Evaluate efficacy and tolerability of lopinavir/ritonavir (LPV/r) plus stavudine and lamivudine long term in antiretroviral-naïve patients. Design: Open-label follow-up of prospective, randomized, multicenter trial. Method: Antiretroviral-naïve HIV—infected subjects (N = 00) received of 3 doses of LPV/r plus stavudine and lamivudine for 48 weeks then received LPV/r soft-gel capsules 400/00 mg plus stavudine and lamivudine. After 6 years, subjects replaced stavudine with tenofovir. Results: At 7 years, by intent-to-treat analysis, 61 % had plasma HIV-RNA n = 6), personal/other reasons (0), loss to follow-up (9), and noncompliance (4). Among 28 subjects qualifying for drug resistance testing, no protease inhibitor or stavudine resistance was observed and 4 showed lamivudine resistance. Most common drug-related moderate or severe adverse events were diarrhea (28%), nausea (6%), and abdominal pain (11 %). Subjects who received stavudine (median 6.6 years) and switched to tenofovir demonstrated significant improvements in total cholesterol (p = .009), triglycerides (p = .023), apolipoprotein C-III (p < .001 ), adiponectin (p = .008), fasting insulin (p = .04), and leptin (p = .03). Conclusion: LPV/r-based therapy demonstrated sustained efficacy with no protease inhibitor or stavudine resistance through 7 years in antiretroviral-naïve patients. Switching from stavudine to tenofovir resulted in significant improvements in multiple metabolic parameters.Keywords
This publication has 31 references indexed in Scilit:
- British HIV Association (BHIVA) guidelines for the treatment of HIV‐infected adults with antiretroviral therapy (2005)HIV Medicine, 2005
- Efficacy and Safety of Tenofovir DF vs Stavudine in Combination Therapy in Antiretroviral-Naive PatientsA 3-Year Randomized TrialJAMA, 2004
- Once‐Daily versus Twice‐Daily Lopinavir/Ritonavir in Antiretroviral‐Naive HIV‐Positive Patients: A 48‐Week Randomized Clinical TrialThe Journal of Infectious Diseases, 2004
- Six-year follow-up of HIV-1-infected adults in a clinical trial of antiretroviral therapy with indinavir, zidovudine, and lamivudineAIDS, 2003
- Safety and Antiviral Activity at 48 Weeks of Lopinavir/Ritonavir plus Nevirapine and 2 Nucleoside Reverse‐Transcriptase Inhibitors in Human Immunodeficiency Virus Type 1–Infected Protease Inhibitor–Experienced PatientsThe Journal of Infectious Diseases, 2002
- Nelfinavir, Efavirenz, or Both after the Failure of Nucleoside Treatment of HIV InfectionNew England Journal of Medicine, 2001
- Human Serum Attenuates the Activity of Protease Inhibitors toward Wild-Type and Mutant Human Immunodeficiency VirusVirology, 1998
- Declining Morbidity and Mortality among Patients with Advanced Human Immunodeficiency Virus InfectionNew England Journal of Medicine, 1998
- Randomised placebo-controlled trial of ritonavir in advanced HIV-1 diseaseThe Lancet, 1998
- Treatment with Indinavir, Zidovudine, and Lamivudine in Adults with Human Immunodeficiency Virus Infection and Prior Antiretroviral TherapyNew England Journal of Medicine, 1997