Preoperative Diagnosis of Carotid Artery Stenosis
Top Cited Papers
- 1 August 2002
- journal article
- research article
- Published by Wolters Kluwer Health in Stroke
- Vol. 33 (8) , 2003-2008
- https://doi.org/10.1161/01.str.0000021900.58396.44
Abstract
Background and Purpose— Carotid endarterectomy has been shown to be beneficial in symptomatic patients with a severe stenosis (70% to 99%) of the internal carotid artery (ICA). Digital subtraction ...Keywords
This publication has 27 references indexed in Scilit:
- How does the degree of carotid stenosis affect the accuracy and interobserver variability of magnetic resonance angiography?Journal of Neurology, Neurosurgery & Psychiatry, 2001
- Accuracy of Three-Dimensional Gadolinium-Enhanced MR Angiography in the Assessment of Extracranial Carotid Artery DiseaseAmerican Journal of Roentgenology, 2000
- Comparison of intra-arterial digital subtraction angiography, magnetic resonance angiography and duplex ultrasonography for measuring carotid artery stenosisBritish Journal of Surgery, 1999
- Benefit of Carotid Endarterectomy in Patients with Symptomatic Moderate or Severe StenosisNew England Journal of Medicine, 1998
- Complications of cerebral angiography in patients with symptomatic carotid territory ischaemia screened by carotid ultrasound.Journal of Neurology, Neurosurgery & Psychiatry, 1993
- Detection and quantification of carotid artery stenosis: efficacy of various Doppler velocity parameters.American Journal of Roentgenology, 1993
- Beneficial Effect of Carotid Endarterectomy in Symptomatic Patients with High-Grade Carotid StenosisNew England Journal of Medicine, 1991
- MRC European Carotid Surgery Trial: interim results for symptomatic patients with severe (70-99%) or with mild (0-29%) carotid stenosisThe Lancet, 1991
- Complications of cerebral angiography for patients with mild carotid territory ischaemia being considered for carotid endarterectomy.Journal of Neurology, Neurosurgery & Psychiatry, 1990
- STATISTICAL METHODS FOR ASSESSING AGREEMENT BETWEEN TWO METHODS OF CLINICAL MEASUREMENTThe Lancet, 1986