Abstract
Expansion of the options available for the treatment of congenital heart disease has been accompanied by an increasing realization of the limits of our available health care resources. Cost-effectiveness analysis is one of several analytic approaches that can improve decisions about the appropriate use of technology in interventional pediatric cardiology and other fields. In this article, cost-effectiveness analysis is distinguished from related approaches, such as cost-benefit analysis. Then, basic principles of cost-effectiveness analysis are described. Next, the application of these principles is illustrated, using a recently published comparison of transcatheter versus surgical closure of patent ductus arteriosus. Finally, potential research implications of the surprising findings of this study are discussed.