Cost‐Effectiveness Analysis of Interventions for Congenital Heart Disease
- 1 October 1995
- journal article
- review article
- Published by Wiley in Journal of Interventional Cardiology
- Vol. 8 (5) , 579-598
- https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1540-8183.1995.tb00585.x
Abstract
Expansion of the options available for the treatment of congenital heart disease has been accompanied by an increasing realization of the limits of our available health care resources. Cost-effectiveness analysis is one of several analytic approaches that can improve decisions about the appropriate use of technology in interventional pediatric cardiology and other fields. In this article, cost-effectiveness analysis is distinguished from related approaches, such as cost-benefit analysis. Then, basic principles of cost-effectiveness analysis are described. Next, the application of these principles is illustrated, using a recently published comparison of transcatheter versus surgical closure of patent ductus arteriosus. Finally, potential research implications of the surprising findings of this study are discussed.Keywords
This publication has 51 references indexed in Scilit:
- Bias in analytic researchPublished by Elsevier ,2004
- Blood transfusion costs: a multicenter studyTransfusion, 1991
- Frequency of occurrence of residual ductal flow after surgical ligation by color-flow mappingThe American Journal of Cardiology, 1991
- Transcatheter closure of patent ductus arteriosus in pediatric patientsThe Journal of Pediatrics, 1989
- Angiographic classification of the isolated, persistently patent ductus arteriosus and implications for percutaneous catheter occlusionPublished by Elsevier ,1989
- Results and Policy Implications of the Resource-Based Relative-Value StudyNew England Journal of Medicine, 1988
- Interventional catheterization in pediatric congenital and acquired heart diseaseThe American Journal of Cardiology, 1988
- Use and Misuse of the Term “Cost Effective” in MedicineNew England Journal of Medicine, 1986
- Hospital Cost ShiftingNew England Journal of Medicine, 1984
- The Toss-upNew England Journal of Medicine, 1981