Relationship Between Discharge Practices and Intensive Care Unit In-Hospital Mortality Performance
- 1 July 2009
- journal article
- research article
- Published by Wolters Kluwer Health in Medical Care
- Vol. 47 (7) , 803-812
- https://doi.org/10.1097/mlr.0b013e3181a39454
Abstract
Context: Current intensive care unit performance measures include in-hospital mortality after intensive care unit admission. This measure does not account for deaths occurring after transfer to another hospital or soon after discharge and therefore, may be biased. Objective: Determine how transfer rates to other acute care hospitals and early post-discharge mortality rates impact hospital performance assessments using an in-hospital mortality model. Design, Setting, and Participants: Data were retrospectively collected on 10,502 eligible intensive care unit patients across 35 California hospitals between 2001 and 2004. Measures: We calculated the rates of acute care hospital transfers and early post-discharge mortality (30-day overall mortality—30-day in-hospital mortality) for each hospital. We assessed hospital performance with standardized mortality ratios (SMRs) using the Mortality Probability Model III. Using regression models, we explored the relationship between in-hospital SMRs and the rates of hospital transfers or early post-discharge mortality. We explored the same relationship using a 30-day SMR. Results: In multivariable models, for each 1% increase in patients transferred to another acute care hospital, there was an in-hospital SMR reduction of −0.021 (−0.040−0.001). Additionally, a 1% increase in early post-discharge mortality was associated with an in-hospital SMR reduction of −0.049 (−0.142–0.045). Assessing hospital performance based upon 30-day mortality end point resulted in SMRs closer to 1.0 for hospitals at high and low ends of in-hospital mortality performance. Conclusions: Variations in transfer rates and potentially discharge timing appear to bias in-hospital SMR calculations. A 30-day mortality model is a potential alternative that may limit this bias.Keywords
This publication has 40 references indexed in Scilit:
- Bringing quality improvement into the intensive care unitCritical Care Medicine, 2007
- Quality and Safety in the Intensive Care UnitJournal of Intensive Care Medicine, 2006
- The Critical Care Safety Study: The incidence and nature of adverse events and serious medical errors in intensive care*Critical Care Medicine, 2005
- Variation in outcomes in Veterans Affairs intensive care units with a computerized severity measure*Critical Care Medicine, 2005
- Critical care medicine in the United States 1985–2000: An analysis of bed numbers, use, and costs*Critical Care Medicine, 2004
- Rating the quality of intensive care units: Is it a function of the intensive care unit scoring system?*Critical Care Medicine, 2002
- Analytic Reviews: Considerations in the Development of Intensive Care Unit Report CardsJournal of Intensive Care Medicine, 2002
- Identifying quality outliers in a large, multiple-institution database by using customized versions of the Simplified Acute Physiology Score II and the Mortality Probability Model II0*Critical Care Medicine, 2002
- The performance of SAPS II in a cohort of patients admitted to 99 Italian ICUs: Results from GiViTIIntensive Care Medicine, 1996
- A comparison of severity of illness scoring systems for intensive care unit patientsCritical Care Medicine, 1995