Is the public's ignorance of politics trivial?
- 1 January 2003
- journal article
- research article
- Published by Taylor & Francis in Critical Review
- Vol. 15 (3-4) , 307-337
- https://doi.org/10.1080/08913810308443585
Abstract
Examination of a comprehensive database of political knowledge, constructed from pooled 1988 and 1992 National Election Studies, refutes criticisms that haue sometimes been lodged against standard tests that seem to reveal profound levels of public ignorance. Although most people know something about politics, the typical citizen is poorly informed, and only a small group is very knowledgeable about politics. Differentiating people according to their perceptions of the most important national problem does not reveal pockets of well‐informed “issue publics” among the electorate. The NES data also show that knowledge makes a difference in how people feel about government spending for social‐welfare programs, and in how well citizens were able to connect their partisanship and ideological proclivities to their votes in the 2000 presidential election.Keywords
This publication has 69 references indexed in Scilit:
- Democracy despite voter ignorance: A Weberian reply to Somin and FriedmanCritical Review, 1999
- Voter ignorance and the democratic idealCritical Review, 1998
- Public ignorance and democratic theoryCritical Review, 1998
- Political Expertise and Issue Voting in Presidential ElectionsPolitical Research Quarterly, 1997
- Citizens' Knowledge of Foreign AffairsThe International Journal of Press/Politics, 1996
- What is public opinion?Critical Review, 1996
- Why voters fail information tests: Can the hurdles be overcome?Political Communication, 1994
- What You Use Depends on What You HaveAmerican Politics Quarterly, 1990
- The Pattern and Importance of Public Knowledge in the Nuclear AgeJournal of Conflict Resolution, 1988
- Attitude Attribution: A Group Basis for Political ReasoningAmerican Political Science Review, 1985