Pathobiologic identification of two distinct breast carcinoma subsets with diverging clinical behaviors
- 1 May 1999
- journal article
- research article
- Published by Springer Nature in Breast Cancer Research and Treatment
- Vol. 55 (2) , 167-175
- https://doi.org/10.1023/a:1006262324959
Abstract
Many different pathological and biological variables which characterize breast carcinomas have been found to be associated. The aim of this work was to analyze the complex relationship among these parameters. The pathologic, biologic, and clinical characteristics of a series of primary breast carcinomas from 676 patients were retrospectively investigated. Multiple correspondence analysis of 13 factors revealed clustering of eight pathobiologic variables, that is histologic grade, necrosis, lymphoid infiltration, number of mitoses, c‐erbB‐2 overexpression, p53, progesterone receptor, and bcl2 expression. An index for each tumor calculated on the basis of these eight factors served to distinguish two different tumor phenotypes, designated A and B. Phenotype A is represented by tumors sharing most of the biologic features of normal breast tissues: indeed, these tumors are characterized by a relatively high degree of differentiation, low proliferation, no necrosis or leukocyte infiltration, and no gene alterations. By contrast, phenotype B is quite divergent from the normal tissue because of its poor differentiation, high proliferation, frequent gene alterations and evidence of a host immune reaction. As regards the disease progression, these two subsets showed marked differences: phenotype A tumors had a low recurrence rate per year that remained constant over time and affected more frequently elderly patients, whereas group B tumors showed high aggressivity in the first years after surgery followed by a low long‐term recurrence rate and were more frequently seen in younger patients. These data suggest that breast carcinoma consists of two different subsets that can be identified on the basis of pathobiologic features.Keywords
This publication has 20 references indexed in Scilit:
- Time distribution of the recurrence risk for breast cancer patients undergoing mastectomy: Further support about the concept of tumor dormancyBreast Cancer Research and Treatment, 1996
- Pathological prognostic factors in breast cancer. IV: Should you be a typer or a grader? A comparative study of two histological prognostic features in operable breast carcinomaHistopathology, 1995
- The Bcl-2 Protein: a Prognostic Indicator Strongly Related to p53 Protein in Lymph Node-Negative Breast Cancer PatientsJNCI Journal of the National Cancer Institute, 1994
- Do we really need prognostic factors for breast cancer?Breast Cancer Research and Treatment, 1994
- Monoclonal antibodies against recombinant parts of the Ki‐67 antigen (MIB 1 and MIB 3) detect proliferating cells in microwave‐processed formalin‐fixed paraffin sectionsThe Journal of Pathology, 1992
- Prognostic Factors and Treatment Decisions in Axillary-Node-Negative Breast CancerNew England Journal of Medicine, 1992
- Prognostic significance of her‐2/neu expression in breast cancer and its relationship to other prognostic factorsInternational Journal of Cancer, 1991
- The Geometric Interpretation of Correspondence AnalysisJournal of the American Statistical Association, 1987
- Human Breast Cancer: Correlation of Relapse and Survival with Amplification of the HER-2/ neu OncogeneScience, 1987
- Design and analysis of randomized clinical trials requiring prolonged observation of each patient. II. Analysis and examplesBritish Journal of Cancer, 1977