The Nature of Utility Functions in Mass Publics
- 1 March 1989
- journal article
- Published by Cambridge University Press (CUP) in American Political Science Review
- Vol. 83 (1) , 143-163
- https://doi.org/10.2307/1956438
Abstract
Survey data are used to test the basic tenets of rational choice theory. We find that (1) voters' preferences are orderly but voters do not always have preferences. When the perceived difference between two candidates is below some threshold, voters are indifferent between them. (2) Most voters choose candidates whose issue positions are congruent with their own. (3) Lack of knowledge about candidates affects choice and utility through two routes—indifference and risk aversion.Most voters have highly structured utility functions, but the thresholds and risk aversion in these functions place relatively unknown candidates at a disadvantage in presidential primaries and other electoral situations. Moreover, the importance of knowledge in these functions suggests that social choice theorists must take seriously the classic concerns of public opinion research—the operation of the media and the dynamics of information in elections.Keywords
This publication has 23 references indexed in Scilit:
- The Logic of Collective ChoicePublished by Columbia University Press ,1986
- Attitude Attribution: A Group Basis for Political ReasoningAmerican Political Science Review, 1985
- Linear Utility Functions on Semiordered Mixture SpacesEconometrica, 1980
- Judgment under Uncertainty: Heuristics and BiasesScience, 1974
- What if utility functions do not exist?Theory and Decision, 1972
- Intransitive Indifference in Preference Theory: A SurveyOperations Research, 1970
- A Theory of the Calculus of VotingAmerican Political Science Review, 1968
- Quasi-Newton methods and their application to function minimisationMathematics of Computation, 1967
- Foundational aspects of theories of measurementThe Journal of Symbolic Logic, 1958
- A NOTE ON TUE THEORY OF CONSUMER'S BEHAVIOUROxford Economic Papers, 1950