The Burden of Proof: Validity as Improvement of Instructional Practice
- 1 May 1995
- journal article
- research article
- Published by SAGE Publications in Exceptional Children
- Vol. 61 (6) , 510-519
- https://doi.org/10.1177/001440299506100602
Abstract
This article examines the validity of three recent efforts to improve instructional assessment in mathematics for special education students. In our view, to claim that an assessment is valid for informing instruction, researchers must present evidence indicating that the assessment information is in fact used by teachers as intended and that it results in improved student learning. We use examples from the three research efforts to illustrate these points and suggest fruitful areas for further research. This discussion highlights crucial relationships among constructs underlying effective practice and assessment in the context of the mathematics reform movement.Keywords
This publication has 30 references indexed in Scilit:
- The Need for Technological Advances in Assessment Related to National Educational ReformExceptional Children, 1994
- Ideologies, Practices, and their Implications for Special EducationThe Journal of Special Education, 1994
- Constructivism in Mathematics and Science EducationEducational Researcher, 1994
- With an Eye on the Mathematical Horizon: Dilemmas of Teaching Elementary School MathematicsThe Elementary School Journal, 1993
- Reflections and Deflections of Policy: The Case of Carol TurnerEducational Evaluation and Policy Analysis, 1990
- Roots of the Whole-Language MovementThe Elementary School Journal, 1989
- Paradigms LostJournal of Learning Disabilities, 1988
- Reading Instruction in Special Education Resource RoomsAmerican Educational Research Journal, 1986
- A constructive look at follow through resultsInterchange, 1981
- Similar Sound Separation and Cumulative Introduction in Learning Letter-Sound CorrespondencesThe Journal of Educational Research, 1976