Deliberative rhetoric as a step in organizational crisis management: Exxon as a case study
- 1 January 1995
- journal article
- research article
- Published by Taylor & Francis in Communication Reports
- Vol. 8 (1) , 54-60
- https://doi.org/10.1080/08934219509367607
Abstract
When organizations face crises, their rhetorical response must often follow two steps. The first step involves the assessment of causes leading to the crisis, and typically demands forensic discourse. The second step consists of searching for solutions intended to cope with the existing crisis and to avoid similar crises in the future. Epideictic rhetoric designed to sustain or regain the organization's reputation is effective in both steps. Organizations that ignore or engage in the deliberative step of their crisis response without a clear idea of what regulations they wish to see adopted or rejected may miss an opportunity to favorably influence their future.Keywords
This publication has 8 references indexed in Scilit:
- Exxon and the Valdez accident: A failure in crisis communicationCommunication Studies, 1992
- ENACTED SENSEMAKING IN CRISIS SITUATIONS[1]Journal of Management Studies, 1988
- The challenger tragedy and search for legitimacyCentral States Speech Journal, 1986
- Managing issues and influencing public policyPublic Relations Review, 1985
- Baldwin vs. Edward VIII: A case study inkategoriaandapologiaSouthern Speech Communication Journal, 1984
- Mobil's epideictic advocacy: “Observations” of Prometheus‐boundCommunication Monographs, 1983
- Kategoriaandapologia:On their rhetorical criticism as a speech setQuarterly Journal of Speech, 1982
- Managing public policy issuesPublic Relations Review, 1979