The race-specific elicitor, NIP1, from the barley pathogen, Rhynchosporium secalis, determines avirulence on host plants of the Rrs1 resistance genotype.
Open Access
- 1 September 1995
- journal article
- research article
- Published by Springer Nature in The EMBO Journal
- Vol. 14 (17) , 4168-4177
- https://doi.org/10.1002/j.1460-2075.1995.tb00090.x
Abstract
NIP1, a small phytotoxic protein secreted by the barley pathogen Rhynchosporium secalis, is a race‐specific elicitor of defense responses in barley cultivars carrying the resistance gene, Rrs1. Co‐inoculation employing spores from a virulent fungal race together with the NIP1 protein converted the phenotype of the interaction from compatible to incompatible only on Rrs1‐containing plants. In addition, transformation of a virulent fungal race with the nip1 gene yielded avirulent transformants. This demonstrated that the protein is the product of a fungal avirulence gene. The fungal genome was found to contain a single copy of the nip1 gene. Sequence analysis of nip1 cDNA and genomic clones revealed that the gene consists of two exons and one intron. The derived amino acid sequence comprised a secretory signal peptide of 22 amino acids and a cysteine‐rich mature protein of 60 amino acids. All fungal races that were avirulent on barley cultivars of the Rrs1 resistance genotype carry and express the nip1 gene and secrete an elicitor‐active NIP1 polypeptide. In contrast, races lacking this gene were virulent. In addition, single nucleotide exchanges were detected in the coding region of the nip1 alleles in one virulent fungal race and in a race whose interaction with barley is not controlled by the Rrs1 gene. The resulting exchanges of single amino acids render the gene products elicitor‐inactive. Thus, the R.secalis‐barley interaction provides the first example of a pathosystem conforming to the gene‐for‐gene hypothesis in which a plant with a particular resistance gene recognizes a pathogen by a virulence factor, i.e. one of its offensive weapons. On the fungal side, in turn, recognition by the host plant is eluded by either deletion of the encoding gene or alteration of the primary structure of the gene product.Keywords
This publication has 27 references indexed in Scilit:
- Host resistance to a fungal tomato pathogen lost by a single base-pair change in an avirulence geneNature, 1994
- Identification and characterization of MPG1, a gene involved in pathogenicity from the rice blast fungus Magnaporthe grisea.Plant Cell, 1993
- Cerato-ulmin, a toxin involved in Dutch elm disease, is a fungal hydrophobin.Plant Cell, 1993
- Cultivar-Specific Elicitation of Barley Defense Reactions by the Phytotoxic Peptide NIP1 fromRhynchosporium secalisMolecular Plant-Microbe Interactions®, 1993
- A Gene Encoding a Host-Specific Elicitor Protein ofPhytophthora parasiticaMolecular Plant-Microbe Interactions®, 1993
- The Neurospora circadian clock-controlled gene, ccg-2, is allelic to eas and encodes a fungal hydrophobin required for formation of the conidial rodlet layer.Genes & Development, 1992
- Molecular analysis of the avirulence gene avr9 of the fungal tomato pathogen Cladosporium fulvum fully supports the gene-for-gene hypothesisThe Plant Journal, 1992
- Effect of a Virus on Accumulation of a Tissue-Specific Cell-Surface Protein of the FungusCryphonectria (Endothia) parasiticaMolecular Plant-Microbe Interactions®, 1992
- Hydrophobin Genes Involved in Formation of Aerial Hyphae and Fruit Bodies in Schizophyllum.Plant Cell, 1991
- Structure and activity of proteins from pathogenic fungiPhytophthoraeliciting necrosis and acquired resistance in tobaccoEuropean Journal of Biochemistry, 1989