Resolving the cosmological missing energy problem
- 12 February 1999
- journal article
- research article
- Published by American Physical Society (APS) in Physical Review D
- Vol. 59 (6) , 063005
- https://doi.org/10.1103/physrevd.59.063005
Abstract
Some form of missing energy may account for the difference between the observed cosmic matter density and the critical density. Two leading candidates are a cosmological constant and quintessence (a time-varying, inhomogeneous component with negative pressure). We show that an ideal, full-sky cosmic background anisotropy experiment may not be able to distinguish the two, even when non-linear effects due to gravitational lensing are included. Because of this ambiguity, microwave background experiments alone may not determine the matter density or Hubble constant very precisely. We further show that degeneracy may remain even after considering classical cosmological tests and measurements of large scale structure.Keywords
All Related Versions
This publication has 28 references indexed in Scilit:
- The Case of the Curved Universe: Open, Closed, or Flat?Science, 1998
- Cosmological Imprint of an Energy Component with General Equation of StatePhysical Review Letters, 1998
- Analysis of Time Delays in the Gravitational Lens PG 1115+080The Astrophysical Journal, 1997
- Microwave Background Constraints on Cosmological ParametersThe Astrophysical Journal, 1997
- The cosmological constant is backGeneral Relativity and Gravitation, 1995
- The observational case for a low-density Universe with a non-zero cosmological constantNature, 1995
- Does a cosmological constant increase the effect of gravitational lensing on the cosmic microwave background?The Astrophysical Journal, 1993
- Gravitational lensing and the cosmic microwave backgroundThe Astrophysical Journal, 1993
- The Cosmological ConstantAnnual Review of Astronomy and Astrophysics, 1992
- The cosmological constant problemReviews of Modern Physics, 1989