SA1 and RA Afferent Responses to Static and Vibrating Gratings
- 1 March 2006
- journal article
- research article
- Published by American Physiological Society in Journal of Neurophysiology
- Vol. 95 (3) , 1771-1782
- https://doi.org/10.1152/jn.00877.2005
Abstract
SA1 and RA afferent fibers differ both in their ability to convey information about the fine spatial structure of tactile stimuli and in their frequency sensitivity profiles. In the present study, we investigated the extent to which the spatial resolution of the signal conveyed by SA1 and RA fibers depends on the temporal properties of the stimulus. To that end, we recorded the responses evoked in SA1 and RA fibers of macaques by static and vibrating gratings that varied in spatial period, vibratory frequency, and amplitude. Gratings were oriented either parallel to the long axis of the finger (vertical) or perpendicular to it (horizontal). We examined the degree to which afferent responses were dependent on the spatial period, vibratory frequency, amplitude, and orientation of the gratings. We found that the spatial modulation of the afferent responses increased as the spatial period of the gratings increased; the spatial modulation was the same for static and vibrating gratings, despite large differences in evoked spike rates; the spatial modulation in SA1 responses was independent of stimulus amplitude over the range of amplitudes tested, whereas RA modulation decreased slightly as the stimulus amplitude increased; vertical gratings evoked stronger and more highly modulated responses than horizontal gratings; the modulation in SA1 responses was higher than that in RA responses at all frequencies and amplitudes. The behavioral consequences of these neurophysiological findings are examined in a companion paper.Keywords
This publication has 45 references indexed in Scilit:
- The vibrations of textureSomatosensory & Motor Research, 2003
- The Two-Point ThresholdCurrent Directions in Psychological Science, 2000
- Factors affecting tactile spatial acuitySomatosensory & Motor Research, 1998
- Superior sensitivity for tactile stimuli oriented proximally-distally on the finger: Implications for mixed class 1 and class 2 anisotropies.Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance, 1997
- Perceived Intensity of Vibrotactile Stimuli: The Role of Mechanoreceptive ChannelsSomatosensory & Motor Research, 1996
- Neural Mechanisms of Tactual form and Texture PerceptionAnnual Review of Neuroscience, 1992
- Four channels mediate the mechanical aspects of touchThe Journal of the Acoustical Society of America, 1988
- Spatial properties of the population of mechanoreceptive units in the glabrous skin of the human handBrain Research, 1980
- Single Unit Analysis of Mechanoreceptor Activity from the Human Glabrous SkinActa Physiologica Scandinavica, 1970
- Fine Structure of the Receptor Organs and its Probable Functional SignificancePublished by Wiley ,1966