Are Received Risk Perception Models Alive and Well?
- 1 August 2002
- journal article
- editorial
- Published by Wiley in Risk Analysis
- Vol. 22 (4) , 665-669
- https://doi.org/10.1111/0272-4332.00058
Abstract
Two recent papers on risk perception models are discussed. In these papers, quantitative analyses are presented of risk perception in relation to risk characteristics as specified in the Psychometric Model, and to cultural biases according to Cultural Theory. This comment points out that the data quality of these two studies is doubtful, with a very small convenience sample and a very low response rate. More importantly, the analyses show the same low levels of explained variance of risk perception as other researchers have found previously, but the authors still draw optimistic conclusions from their data. Such conclusions are unjustified.Keywords
This publication has 22 references indexed in Scilit:
- Consequences matter, ‘risk’ is marginalJournal of Risk Research, 2000
- Factors in Risk PerceptionRisk Analysis, 2000
- Consequences of perceived risk: Demand for mitigationJournal of Risk Research, 1999
- A Quantitative Test of the Cultural Theory of Risk Perceptions: Comparison with the Psychometric ParadigmRisk Analysis, 1998
- Comparative studies of risk perception: a review of twenty years of researchJournal of Risk Research, 1998
- The Design And Administration Of Mail SurveysAnnual Review of Sociology, 1991
- Public Perceptions of the Risks and Benefits of Technology1Risk Analysis, 1989
- Risk, moral value of actions, and moodScandinavian Journal of Psychology, 1986
- Factors Affecting Response Rates to Mailed Questionnaires: A Quantitative Analysis of the Published LiteratureAmerican Sociological Review, 1978
- FACTIFUGINGThe Lancet, 1962