COST SHARING IN TRANSITION: THE CASE OF PLAN 6, CENTRAL ARIZONA PROJECT1
- 1 October 1987
- journal article
- Published by Wiley in Jawra Journal of the American Water Resources Association
- Vol. 23 (5) , 749-759
- https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1752-1688.1987.tb02949.x
Abstract
In the past, development of Federal water resource projects depended heavily or exclusively on Federal financing of construction costs. However, pressures on the Federal budget, environmental issues, and the notion that there are economic efficiency gains when beneficiaries of Federal water resource projects increase their cost share are causing changes. The case of the Central Arizona Project Plan 6 is a noteworthy example of the transition to more non‐Federal participation in water resource development. This is because the non‐Federal financing is to be provided for a project already under construction. The negotiation and terms of the Plan 6 financing agreement between the Department of the Interior and multiple interests in Arizona are used as an example of how Federal water project cost sharing is in a state of transition. The negotiation process is described, a financial analysis is provided, and the terms of the agreement and policy issues that were deliberated in the Executive Branch of the Federal Government are discussed.Keywords
This publication has 5 references indexed in Scilit:
- RECENT TRENDS IN FEDERAL WATER RESOURCE MANAGEMENT: ARE THE ‘IRON TRIANGLES’ IN RETREAT?Review of Policy Research, 1985
- THE CENTRAL ARIZONA WATER CONTROL STUDY: A COMPARISON OF ALTERNATE PLANS USING CONCORDANCE ANALYSIS AND MULTI-DIMENSION SCALINGJawra Journal of the American Water Resources Association, 1984
- THE CENTRAL ARIZONA WATER CONTROL STUDY: A CASE FOR MULTIOBJECTIVE PLANNING AND PUBLIC INVOLVEMENT1Jawra Journal of the American Water Resources Association, 1984
- CorrectionThe Journal of cell biology, 1984
- FINANCING FEDERAL WATER DEVELOPEMNT PROJECTS AND SHARING THE COSTS1Jawra Journal of the American Water Resources Association, 1980