Antifungal prophylaxis for severely neutropenic chemotherapy recipients
Open Access
- 12 June 2002
- Vol. 94 (12) , 3230-3246
- https://doi.org/10.1002/cncr.10610
Abstract
BACKGROUND The overall clinical efficacy of the azoles antifungal agents and low‐dose intravenous amphotericin B for antifungal chemoprophylaxis in patients with malignant disease who have severe neutropenia remains unclear. METHODS Randomized‐controlled trials of azoles (fluconazole, itraconazole, ketoconazole, and miconazole) or intravenous amphotericin B formulations compared with placebo/no treatment or polyene‐based controls in severely neutropenic chemotherapy recipients were evaluated using meta‐analytical techniques. RESULTS Thirty‐eight trials that included 7014 patients (study agents, 3515 patients; control patients, 3499 patients) were analyzed. Overall, there were reductions in the use of parenteral antifungal therapy (prophylaxis success: odds ratio [OR], 0.57; 95% confidence interval [95% CI], 0.48–0.68; relative risk reduction [RRR], 19%; number requiring treatment for this outcome [NNT], 10 patients), superficial fungal infection (OR, 0.29; 95% CI, 0.20–0.43; RRR, 61%; NNT, 12 patients), invasive fungal infection (OR, 0.44; 95% CI, 0.35–0.55; RRR, 56%; NNT, 22 patients), and fungal infection‐related mortality (OR, 0.58; 95% CI, 0.41–0.82; RRR, 47%; NNT, 52 patients). Invasive aspergillosis was unaffected (OR, 1.03; 95% CI, 0.62–1.44). Although overall mortality was not reduced (OR, 0.87; 95% CI, 0.74–1.03), subgroup analyses showed reduced mortality in studies of patients who had prolonged neutropenia (OR, 0.72; 95% CI, 0.55–0.95) or who underwent hematopoietic stem cell transplantation (HSCT) (OR, 0.77; 95% CI, 0.59–0.99). The multivariate metaregression analyses identified HSCT, prolonged neutropenia, acute leukemia with prolonged neutropenia, and higher azole dose as predictors of treatment effect. CONCLUSIONS Antifungal prophylaxis reduced morbidity, as evidenced by reductions in the use of parenteral antifungal therapy, superficial fungal infection, and invasive fungal infection, as well as reducing fungal infection‐related mortality. These effects were most pronounced in patients with malignant disease who had prolonged neutropenia and HSCT recipients. Cancer 2002;94:3230–46. © 2002 American Cancer Society. DOI 10.1002/cncr.10610Keywords
Funding Information
- Pfizer, Canada, Inc.
This publication has 104 references indexed in Scilit:
- Bone Marrow Transplants from Unrelated Donors for Patients with Chronic Myeloid LeukemiaNew England Journal of Medicine, 1998
- Prophylaxis of candidiasis in patients with leukemia and bone marrow transplantsOral Surgery Oral Medicine Oral Pathology Oral Radiology and Endodontology, 1996
- Controlled study of fluconazole in the prevention of fungal infections in neutropenic patients with haematological malignancies and bone marrow transplant recipientsEuropean Journal of Clinical Microbiology & Infectious Diseases, 1994
- A Controlled Trial of Fluconazole to Prevent Fungal Infections in Patients Undergoing Bone Marrow TransplantationNew England Journal of Medicine, 1992
- An Assessment of Clinically Useful Measures of the Consequences of TreatmentNew England Journal of Medicine, 1988
- Meta-Analyses of Randomized Controlled TrialsNew England Journal of Medicine, 1987
- Meta-analysis in clinical trialsControlled Clinical Trials, 1986
- Nystatin Prophylaxis in Leukemia and LymphomaNew England Journal of Medicine, 1978
- Clinical experience in prevention of candidiasis by nystatin in children with acute lymphocytic leukemiaThe Journal of Pediatrics, 1978
- Oral anticandidal prophylaxis in patients undergoing chemotherapy for acute leukemiaMedical and Pediatric Oncology, 1977