Marriage and ethnicity predict treatment in localized prostate carcinoma
- 18 April 2005
- Vol. 103 (9) , 1819-1825
- https://doi.org/10.1002/cncr.20982
Abstract
BACKGROUND Primary treatment for early‐stage prostate carcinoma includes expectant management or, for curative intent, radical prostatectomy or radiotherapy. Treatment recommendations are generally guided by clinical factors such as Gleason grade, prostate‐specific antigen level, comorbid illnesses, and patient age. Sociocultural factors may also have influences on patient and urologist treatment choices. METHODS The authors used bivariate and multinomial logistic regression to identify medical and sociodemographic predictors of prostatectomy (compared with radiotherapy) and curative therapy (compared with expectant management) in a cohort of 27,920 non‐Latino white, black, and Latino men without comorbidities in the latest linked Surveillance, Epidemiology and End Results–Medicare dataset (years 1995–1999). Predictors included tumor stage, patient age, marital status, race/ethnicity, and soscioeconomic status. RESULTS Younger age and higher tumor grade were robust predictors of curative treatment compared with expectant management and of prostatectomy compared with radiotherapy. Sociodemographic factors had an additive role in treatment choice. Marriage predicted curative treatment compared with expectant management (adjusted risk ratio [RR] = 1.28 [1.25–1.30]) and prostatectomy compared with radiotherapy (adjusted RR = 1.24 [1.20–1.28]). Although blacks and Latinos were just as likely as whites to receive curative treatment, blacks were significantly less likely, whereas Latinos were more likely, to receive prostatectomy compared with radiotherapy (adjusted RRs = 0.77 [0.72–83]) and 1.24 [1.18–1.30], respectively). CONCLUSIONS Marriage was positively associated with curative treatment in general, and with prostatectomy specifically. Blacks received prostatectomy less often than whites, although they did not receive less curative treatment overall. Latinos received prostatectomy more often than whites. Clinicians should recognize the importance of cultural and social forces as well as biomedical factors in decisions regarding the treatment of patients with early‐stage prostate carcinoma. Cancer 2005. © 2005 American Cancer Society.Keywords
This publication has 17 references indexed in Scilit:
- Five-Year Outcomes After Prostatectomy or Radiotherapy for Prostate Cancer: The Prostate Cancer Outcomes StudyJNCI Journal of the National Cancer Institute, 2004
- Methods for Using Medicare Data to Compare Procedure Rates among Asians, Blacks, Hispanics, Native Americans, and WhitesHealth Services Research, 2003
- Racial differences in initial treatment for clinically localized prostate cancerJournal of General Internal Medicine, 2003
- Patient Demographic and Socioeconomic Characteristics in the SEER-Medicare DatabaseMedical Care, 2002
- Overview of the SEER-Medicare DataMedical Care, 2002
- Comparison of Recommendations by Urologists and Radiation Oncologists for Treatment of Clinically Localized Prostate CancerJAMA, 2000
- What's the Relative Risk?JAMA, 1998
- Shared decision-making in the medical encounter: What does it mean? (or it takes at least two to tango)Social Science & Medicine, 1997
- Knowledge, beliefs, and prior screening behavior among blacks and whites reporting for prostate cancer screeningUrology, 1995
- Adapting a clinical comorbidity index for use with ICD-9-CM administrative databasesJournal of Clinical Epidemiology, 1992