Who Reviews the Reviewers? Feasibility of Using a Fictitious Manuscript to Evaluate Peer Reviewer Performance
- 1 September 1998
- journal article
- Published by Elsevier
- Vol. 32 (3) , 310-317
- https://doi.org/10.1016/s0196-0644(98)70006-x
Abstract
No abstract availableKeywords
This publication has 23 references indexed in Scilit:
- Evaluating Peer ReviewsPublished by American Medical Association (AMA) ,1994
- Peer ReviewJAMA, 1994
- Structural Transformations of the Sciences and the End of Peer ReviewPublished by American Medical Association (AMA) ,1994
- An intervention to improve the reliability of manuscript reviews for the Journal of the American Academy of Child and Adolescent PsychiatryAmerican Journal of Psychiatry, 1993
- Assassins and zealots: variations in peer review. Special report.Radiology, 1991
- The Evolution of Editorial Peer ReviewJAMA, 1990
- Guarding the guardians: research on editorial peer review. Selected proceedings from the First International Congress on Peer Review in Biomedical Publication. May 10-12, 1989, Chicago, IllPublished by American Medical Association (AMA) ,1990
- How Good is Peer Review?New England Journal of Medicine, 1989
- Investigating Peer ReviewAnnals of Internal Medicine, 1988
- Peer review in biomedical publicationThe American Journal of Medicine, 1974