Can paying for results help to achieve the Millennium Development Goals? Overview of the effectiveness of results‐based financing
- 28 May 2009
- journal article
- research article
- Published by Wiley in Journal of Evidence-Based Medicine
- Vol. 2 (2) , 70-83
- https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1756-5391.2009.01020.x
Abstract
Results-based financing and pay-for-performance refer to the transfer of money or material goods conditional on taking a measurable action or achieving a predetermined performance target. Results-based financing is widely advocated for achieving health goals, including the Millennium Development Goals. We undertook an overview of systematic reviews of the effectiveness of RBF. We searched the Cochrane Library, EMBASE, and MEDLINE (up to August 2007). We also searched for related articles in PubMed, checked the reference lists of retrieved articles, and contacted key informants. We included reviews with a methods section that addressed the effects of any results-based financing in the health sector targeted at patients, providers, organizations, or governments. We summarized the characteristics and findings of each review using a structured format. We found 12 systematic reviews that met our inclusion criteria. Based on the findings of these reviews, financial incentives targeting recipients of health care and individual healthcare professionals are effective in the short run for simple and distinct, well-defined behavioral goals. There is less evidence that financial incentives can sustain long-term changes. Conditional cash transfers to poor and disadvantaged groups in Latin America are effective at increasing the uptake of some preventive services. There is otherwise very limited evidence of the effects of results-based financing in low- or middle-income countries. Results-based financing can have undesirable effects, including motivating unintended behaviors, distortions (ignoring important tasks that are not rewarded with incentives), gaming (improving or cheating on reporting rather than improving performance), widening the resource gap between rich and poor, and dependency on financial incentives. There is limited evidence of the effectiveness of results-based financing and almost no evidence of the cost-effectiveness of results-based financing. Based on the available evidence and likely mechanisms through which financial incentives work, they are more likely to influence discrete individual behaviors in the short run and less likely to create sustained changes.Keywords
This publication has 18 references indexed in Scilit:
- Can paying for results help to achieve the Millennium Development Goals? A critical review of selected evaluations of results‐based financingJournal of Evidence-Based Medicine, 2009
- Conditional Cash Transfers for Improving Uptake of Health Interventions in Low- and Middle-Income CountriesJAMA, 2007
- Pay for Performance, Public Reporting, and Racial Disparities in Health CareMedical Care Research and Review, 2007
- Pharmaceutical policies: effects of financial incentives for prescribersPublished by Wiley ,2007
- Contracts between patients and healthcare practitioners for improving patients' adherence to treatment, prevention and health promotion activitiesPublished by Wiley ,2006
- What Is the Empirical Basis for Paying for Quality in Health Care?Medical Care Research and Review, 2006
- Economic incentives and physicians’ delivery of preventive care: A systematic reviewAmerican Journal of Preventive Medicine, 2005
- A structured review of the effect of economic incentives on consumers' preventive behaviorAmerican Journal of Preventive Medicine, 2004
- Target payments in primary care: effects on professional practice and health care outcomesCochrane Database of Systematic Reviews, 1999
- Validation of an index of the quality of review articlesPublished by Elsevier ,1991