Influence of adjuvants on physicochemical properties, droplet size spectra and deposit patterns: Relevance in pesticide applications

Publisher Website
Google Scholar
Abstract
The influence of adjuvants on physicochemical properties, droplet size spectra and deposit patterns of five aqueous spray mixtures was studied under laboratory conditions, using two surfactants, Atlox® 3409F and Triton® X‐114; two humectants, propylene glycol and glycerol; and one polymeric adjuvant, Agrlsol FL‐100F. For the sake of comparison, two fenitrothlon formulations containing polymeric adjuvants, and water were also included in the study. Spray was applied at 25°C and 75 ± 5% relative humidity, in an enclosure using a twin fluid atomizer. Deposits were collected on Kromekote card/glass plate units. Physicochemical properties studied were: relative viscosity, surface tension, apparent viscosity‐shear rate relationship, volatility, pH and conductance. The first four of these properties played significant roles on the droplet and deposit patterns on sampling units. However, the chemical nature of the adjuvants also played some role. Between the two surfactants tested, Triton X‐114 provided a pseudoplastic medium, but both surfactant solutions provided similar droplet size spectra and deposit patterns. Between the two humectants, glycerol proved to be more advantageous than propylene glycol. The polymeric adjuvant provided droplet sizes similar to those of the two surfactants, although the recovery of the applied spray volume was higher. Among the two fenitrothion formulations, the one containing lower amounts of polymeric adjuvants showed some advantages, although deposits on the actual biological target should be examined before any definite conclusions can be drawn on the optimum adjuvant concentrations in end‐use formulations.