Why Study the Complexity Sciences in the Social Sciences?
- 1 April 1999
- journal article
- Published by SAGE Publications in Human Relations
- Vol. 52 (4) , 439-462
- https://doi.org/10.1177/001872679905200402
Abstract
Over the past two decades, several new perspectives have emerged in the physical and natural sciences and are collectively referred to as the complexity sciences. Insights from these emerging perspectives have implications that merit consideration for developments and extensions of existing work at the metatheoretical, theoretical, and methodological levels in organization theory. The purpose of this manuscript is to: (a) provide an overview of the complexity sciences, (b) provide a justification and rationale for their inclusion into the social sciences, and (c) review the current organizational literature which utilizes and applies concepts from the complexity sciences to organizational phenomena.Keywords
This publication has 66 references indexed in Scilit:
- EVOLUTION OR TRANSFORMATION: A CRITIQUE AND ALTERNATIVE TO PUNCTUATED EQUILIBRIUM.Academy of Management Proceedings, 1995
- The science of complexity: An alternative perspective for strategic change processesStrategic Management Journal, 1995
- Chaos and Complexity Theory for ManagementJournal of Management Inquiry, 1994
- Chaos theory and strategy: Theory, application, and managerial implicationsStrategic Management Journal, 1994
- Chaos Theory and Its Implications for Social Science ResearchHuman Relations, 1993
- A new productivity paradigm for competitive advantageStrategic Management Journal, 1992
- The Nonlinear Dynamics of International ConflictJournal of Conflict Resolution, 1992
- The Systems Paradigm in Organization Theory: Correcting the Record and Suggesting the FutureAcademy of Management Review, 1987
- MODELING SOCIETY: DYNAMICAL REPLICATIVE SYSTEMSCybernetics and Systems, 1987
- Simple mathematical models with very complicated dynamicsNature, 1976