The science of complexity: An alternative perspective for strategic change processes
- 1 January 1995
- journal article
- research article
- Published by Wiley in Strategic Management Journal
- Vol. 16 (6) , 477-495
- https://doi.org/10.1002/smj.4250160606
Abstract
The two perspectives of strategy process most firmly established in the literature—strategic choice and ecology—assume the same about system dynamics: negative feedback processes driving successful systems (individual organizations or populations of organizations) toward predictable equilibrium states of adaptation to the environment. This paper proposes a third perspective, that of complex adaptive systems. The framework is provided by the modern science of complexity: the study of nonlinear and network feedback systems, incorporating theories of chaos, artificial life, self‐organization and emergent order. Here system dynamics are characterized by positive and negative feedback as systems coevolve far from equilibrium, in a self‐organizing manner, toward unpredictable long‐term outcomes.Keywords
This publication has 16 references indexed in Scilit:
- A diametric forces model of strategic change: Assessing the antecedents and consequences of restructuring in the higher education industryStrategic Management Journal, 1993
- Strategy process research: Focusing on corporate self-renewalStrategic Management Journal, 1992
- Antichaos and AdaptationScientific American, 1991
- Changing generic strategies: Likelihood, direction, and performance implicationsStrategic Management Journal, 1989
- Strategy or Structure? Capital, Labour and ControlWork, Employment & Society, 1987
- Of strategies, deliberate and emergentStrategic Management Journal, 1985
- The Population Ecology of OrganizationsAmerican Journal of Sociology, 1977
- A System Pathology of an Organization: The Rise and Fall of the Old Saturday Evening PostAdministrative Science Quarterly, 1976
- The Strength of Weak TiesAmerican Journal of Sociology, 1973
- Social Pressures in Informal GroupsThe American Catholic Sociological Review, 1950