Hidden Bias in the Use of Archival Data
- 1 June 1987
- journal article
- research article
- Published by SAGE Publications in Evaluation & the Health Professions
- Vol. 10 (2) , 173-185
- https://doi.org/10.1177/016327878701000202
Abstract
Nonresponses in archival data may violate the missing-at-random assumption in ways difficult to detect. Standard methods of comparing sociodemographics of respondents and nonrespondents are inappropriate when the units of analysis are not also the individuals who maintain the archival record. Under these circumstances, the distribution of missing data may be correlated with the dependent variable and traits of the record keepers. This will distort relationships, especially when listwise deletion of missing values is used in multivariate analysis. Data are used from a large clinical chart study of mentally ill patients to demonstrate the process of identifying hidden bias and the implications of such bias.Keywords
This publication has 11 references indexed in Scilit:
- Formalizing Subjective Notions about the Effect of Nonrespondents in Sample SurveysJournal of the American Statistical Association, 1977
- Inference and missing dataBiometrika, 1976
- Comparing Regressions When Some Predictor Values Are MissingTechnometrics, 1976
- A Proposal for Handling Missing DataPsychometrika, 1975
- Estimation of Nonresponse BiasSociological Methods & Research, 1975
- Characterizing the Estimation of Parameters in Incomplete-Data ProblemsJournal of the American Statistical Association, 1974
- Some Sources and Potential Consequences of Errors in Medical Data RecordingMethods of Information in Medicine, 1973
- Hospital Patient StatisticsNew England Journal of Medicine, 1971
- Missing Data in Regression AnalysisJournal of the Royal Statistical Society Series B: Statistical Methodology, 1968