Determining a Range of False-positive Rates for Which ROC Curves Differ
- 1 December 1990
- journal article
- research article
- Published by SAGE Publications in Medical Decision Making
- Vol. 10 (4) , 283-287
- https://doi.org/10.1177/0272989x9001000406
Abstract
Many indices have been proposed for summarizing the information contained in the ROC curve. When comparing two ROC curves, though, there are times when global summary measures are either not optimal or not appropriate. The author presents a method for directly comparing true-positive rates for two diagnostic, screening or prognostic tools, determining over what range of false-positive values the tests differ. The method is applicable for in dependent or dependent samples. An example concerning gallium citrate imaging is pre sented, as well as an example using a prognostic index for severity of illness in the ICU. The range of false-positive rates for which the ROC curves differ is determined for each example.Keywords
This publication has 12 references indexed in Scilit:
- Analyzing a Portion of the ROC CurveMedical Decision Making, 1989
- The Robustness of the "Binormal" Assumptions Used in Fitting ROC CurvesMedical Decision Making, 1988
- Form of empirical ROCs in discrimination and diagnostic tasks: Implications for theory and measurement of performance.Psychological Bulletin, 1986
- Indices of discrimination or diagnostic accuracy: Their ROCs and implied models.Psychological Bulletin, 1986
- Statistical Approaches to the Analysis of Receiver Operating Characteristic (ROC) CurvesMedical Decision Making, 1984
- A New Approach for Testing the Significance of Differences Between ROC Curves Measured from Correlated DataPublished by Springer Nature ,1984
- APACHE—acute physiology and chronic health evaluation: a physiologically based classification systemCritical Care Medicine, 1981
- ROC Analysis Applied to the Evaluation of Medical Imaging TechniquesInvestigative Radiology, 1979
- Basic principles of ROC analysisSeminars in Nuclear Medicine, 1978
- Maximum-likelihood estimation of parameters of signal-detection theory and determination of confidence intervals—Rating-method dataJournal of Mathematical Psychology, 1969