The Formulation of the Declaration of Rights
- 1 June 1974
- journal article
- research article
- Published by Cambridge University Press (CUP) in The Historical Journal
- Vol. 17 (2) , 265-279
- https://doi.org/10.1017/s0018246x00007743
Abstract
After a period of comparative neglect, historians are re-examining the English Revolution of 1688 with revived interest and revised interpretation. In the past few decades numerous works have carefully re-investigated and often reinterpreted the roles played by such disparate groups as the Whigs, die nobility, the common people, and die urban mob, as well as by such leading individuals as die Earl of Sunderland, James II, and William of Orange. They have broadened our perspective of the Revolution by placing it in die wider context of European affairs and have persuasively demonstrated that die replacement of James II by William and Mary was justified most frequently and effectively not by John Locke's Two Treatises of Government, which was indeed composed prior to 1688, but by mat old relic from James I's reign, divine right of kings.Keywords
This publication has 7 references indexed in Scilit:
- The Century of RevolutionPublished by Taylor & Francis ,2014
- I. The Guildhall Declaration of 11 December 1688 and the Counter-Revolution of the LoyalistsThe Historical Journal, 1968
- The Final Phase of Divine Right Theory in England, 1688–1702The English Historical Review, 1962
- III. The Earl of Sunderland and the Revolution of 1688Cambridge Historical Journal, 1955
- William III and the Respectable RevolutionPublished by Harvard University Press ,1954
- II. The Elections To The Convention Parliament Of 1689Cambridge Historical Journal, 1937
- The Dutch Missions to England in 1689The English Historical Review, 1920