Chapter 3: MHD stability, operational limits and disruptions
- 1 December 1999
- journal article
- Published by IOP Publishing in Nuclear Fusion
- Vol. 39 (12) , 2251-2389
- https://doi.org/10.1088/0029-5515/39/12/303
Abstract
The present physics understandings of magnetohydrodynamic (MHD) stability of tokamak plasmas, the threshold conditions for onset of MHD instability, and the resulting operational limits on attainable plasma pressure (beta limit) and density (density limit), and the consequences of plasma disruption and disruption related effects are reviewed and assessed in the context of their application to a future DT burning reactor prototype tokamak experiment such as ITER. The principal considerations covered within the MHD stability and beta limit assessments are (i) magnetostatic equilibrium, ideal MHD stability and the resulting ideal MHD beta limit; (ii) sawtooth oscillations and the coupling of sawtooth activity to other types of MHD instability; (iii) neoclassical island resistive tearing modes and the corresponding limits on beta and energy confinement; (iv) wall stabilization of ideal MHD instabilities and resistive wall instabilities; (v) mode locking effects of non-axisymmetric error fields; (vi) edge localized MHD instabilities (ELMs, etc.); and (vii) MHD instabilities and beta/pressure gradient limits in plasmas with actively modified current and magnetic shear profiles. The principal considerations covered within the density limit assessments are (i) empirical density limits; (ii) edge power balance/radiative density limits in ohmic and L-mode plasmas; and (iii) edge parameter related density limits in H-mode plasmas. The principal considerations covered in the disruption assessments are (i) disruption causes, frequency and MHD instability onset; (ii) disruption thermal and current quench characteristics; (iii) vertical instabilities (VDEs), both before and after disruption, and plasma and in-vessel halo currents; (iv) after disruption runaway electron formation, confinement and loss; (v) fast plasma shutdown (rapid externally initiated dissipation of plasma thermal and magnetic energies); (vi) means for disruption avoidance and disruption effect mitigation; and (vii) `integrated' modelling of disruptions and fast shutdown and of the ensuing effects. In each instance, the presentation within a given topical area progresses from a summary of present experimental and theoretical understanding to how this understanding projects or extrapolates to an ITER class reactor regime tokamak. Examples of extrapolations to the specific ITER design concept developed during the course of the ITER EDA are given, and assessments of the degree of adequacy of present understanding are also provided. In areas where present understanding is identified to be less than fully adequate, areas in which continuing or new research is needed are identified.Keywords
This publication has 228 references indexed in Scilit:
- Impurity fueling to terminate Tokamak dischargesJournal of Nuclear Materials, 1997
- β limit disruptions in the Tokamak Fusion Test ReactorPhysics of Plasmas, 1995
- Stabilization of ideal modes by resistive walls in tokamaks with plasma rotation and its effect on the beta limitPhysics of Plasmas, 1995
- GLF - A simulation code for X-ray lasersApplied Physics B Laser and Optics, 1994
- The interaction of resonant magnetic perturbations with rotating plasmasPhysics of Fluids B: Plasma Physics, 1991
- On free boundary instabilities induced by a resistive wallNuclear Fusion, 1986
- Stochasticity as the mechanism for the disruptive phase of the m = 1 tokamak oscillationsNuclear Fusion, 1984
- Scaling laws for plasma confinementNuclear Fusion, 1977
- Relativistic limitations on runaway electronsNuclear Fusion, 1975
- A necessary condition for hydromagnetic stability of plasma with axial symmetryNuclear Fusion, 1960