Outcomes 15 years after valve replacement with a mechanical versus a bioprosthetic valve: final report of the Veterans Affairs randomized trial
Top Cited Papers
- 28 September 2000
- journal article
- clinical trial
- Published by Elsevier
- Vol. 36 (4) , 1152-1158
- https://doi.org/10.1016/s0735-1097(00)00834-2
Abstract
No abstract availableKeywords
This publication has 14 references indexed in Scilit:
- Long-term outcome after biologic versus mechanical aortic valve replacement in 841 patientsThe Journal of Thoracic and Cardiovascular Surgery, 1999
- ACC/AHA guidelines for the management of patients with valvular heart diseaseJournal of the American College of Cardiology, 1998
- AREVA: Multicenter Randomized Comparison of Low-Dose Versus Standard-Dose Anticoagulation in Patients With Mechanical Prosthetic Heart ValvesCirculation, 1996
- A Comparison of Outcomes in Men 11 Years after Heart-Valve Replacement with a Mechanical Valve or BioprosthesisNew England Journal of Medicine, 1993
- Twelve-Year Comparison of a Bjork–Shiley Mechanical Heart Valve with Porcine BioprosthesesNew England Journal of Medicine, 1991
- Trial of Different Intensities of Anticoagulation in Patients with Prosthetic Heart ValvesNew England Journal of Medicine, 1990
- Lessons learned about the determinants of the results of valve surgery.Circulation, 1988
- Comparison of outcome after valve replacement with a bioprosthesis versus a mechanical prosthesis: Initial 5 year results of a randomized trialJournal of the American College of Cardiology, 1987
- Is the Dose of Warfarin Prescribed by American Physicians Unnecessarily High?Archives of internal medicine (1960), 1987
- Valve replacement—a perspectiveThe American Journal of Cardiology, 1975