A reappraisal of structured analysis
- 1 April 1993
- journal article
- Published by Association for Computing Machinery (ACM) in ACM Transactions on Information Systems
- Vol. 11 (2) , 165-193
- https://doi.org/10.1145/130226.148055
Abstract
We review Structured Analysis as presented by Yourdon and DeMarco. First, we examine the implicit assumptions embodied in the method about the nature of organizations, work processes, and design. Following this we present the results of an exploratory study, conducted to find out how the method is applied in practice. This study reveals that while some of the tools of Structured Analysis—notably the data flow diagrams—are used and combined with other tools, the designers do not follow the analysis and design procedures prescribed by the method. Our findings suggest that there is a gap between the way systems development is portrayed in the normative technical literature and the way in which it is carried out.Keywords
This publication has 15 references indexed in Scilit:
- Cooperative prototyping: users and designers in mutual activityInternational Journal of Man-Machine Studies, 1991
- Designing the Design Process: Exploiting Opportunistic ThoughtsHuman–Computer Interaction, 1990
- Analysis and design of computer systems supporting complex administrative work processesOffice Technology and People, 1988
- Prototyping Versus Specifying: A Multiproject ExperimentIEEE Transactions on Software Engineering, 1984
- Central Perspectives and Debates in Organization TheoryAdministrative Science Quarterly, 1983
- Information systems and organizational changeCommunications of the ACM, 1981
- Cognitive processes in designInternational Journal of Man-Machine Studies, 1980
- Industry and LabourPublished by Springer Nature ,1977
- Evolution of Business System Analysis TechniquesACM Computing Surveys, 1973
- An experiment on program developmentBIT Numerical Mathematics, 1972