The efficiency of six methods of covering silage
Open Access
- 1 August 1965
- journal article
- research article
- Published by Taylor & Francis in New Zealand Journal of Agricultural Research
- Vol. 8 (3) , 542-554
- https://doi.org/10.1080/00288233.1965.10419895
Abstract
An experiment was conducted during two seasons with 25-ton bunker silos to compare six different methods of reducing surface waste. Covering with weighted plastic immediately the bunker was full eliminated surface waste except for a small quantity at the edges of the plastic and in the corners of the bunker. The visible waste was only 0.8 per cent and the total loss of dry matter from all sources 12 per cent. Losses with the other treatments were as follows: no cover, 34.2 per cent; roof. 32.6 per cent; sawdust. 30.0 per cent; soil. 25.0 per cent; limestone. 23.6 per cent. The most desirable silage fermentation occurred in the plastic-covered silage. The effects of poor covering were most marked in the top 1 ft of silage.Keywords
This publication has 7 references indexed in Scilit:
- The effect of oven temperature on the error in estimating the dry matter content of silageNew Zealand Journal of Agricultural Research, 1963
- THE FEEDING VALUE OF SILAGE AND BARN DRIED HAY*Grass and Forage Science, 1962
- Determination of dry matter in silage by distillation with tolueneJournal of the Science of Food and Agriculture, 1961
- Effects of initial consolidation on silageNew Zealand Journal of Agricultural Research, 1961
- The Conservation of Grass and Forage CropsSoil Science, 1961
- Comparisons of Unsealed and Plastic Sealed Silages for Preservation Efficiency and Feeding ValueJournal of Dairy Science, 1961
- Nutrient Losses, Quality, and Feeding Values of Wilted and Direct-cut Orchardgrass Stored in Bunker and Tower SilosJournal of Dairy Science, 1959