New Field Instructors’ Perceptions of Institutional Supports for their Roles
- 1 April 1992
- journal article
- research article
- Published by Taylor & Francis in Journal of Social Work Education
- Vol. 28 (2) , 178-189
- https://doi.org/10.1080/10437797.1992.10778771
Abstract
Evidence indicates that the turnover of field instructors is high, thus threatening the quality and costs of social work education. To determine the factors that contribute to the high turnover rate, the authors surveyed new field instructors. The authors examined the influence of institutional supports offered by the practice setting and by the university on intention to continue and actual continuance, as well as intrinsic rewards and personal issues. The results contribute to an understanding of the career path of field instructors and suggest new short-term strategies to increase retention of field instructors. The authors conclude that the voluntary and somewhat precarious nature of university—agency partnerships for social work education needs to be reconsidered.Keywords
This publication has 14 references indexed in Scilit:
- Recognizing the Educational Contributions of Field InstructorsJournal of Teaching in Social Work, 1990
- Field Instructor TurnoverThe Clinical Supervisor, 1989
- Comparing Structure in Student Supervision by Social Work Program LevelThe Clinical Supervisor, 1987
- Comparing Supervisee and Supervisor Initial Perceptions of SupervisionThe Clinical Supervisor, 1986
- Learning style: State of the scienceTheory Into Practice, 1984
- Differences among supervisees at different levels of training: Implications for a developmental model of supervision.Journal of Counseling Psychology, 1984
- Style differences of beginning supervisors: An interactional analysis.Journal of Counseling Psychology, 1981
- Measuring the Impact of Continuing EducationJournal of Education for Social Work, 1981
- Effective supervision as perceived by beginning counselors-in-training.Journal of Counseling Psychology, 1979
- Self awareness of the supervisor in supervisionClinical Social Work Journal, 1978