CONTROLS FOR AND CONSTRAINTS ON AUTO‐SHAPING

Publisher Website
Google Scholar
Abstract
Auto‐shaping the pigeon's key‐peck response was examined as a respondent conditioning procedure with the use of Rescorla's truly‐random control procedure. In the first experiment, pigeons received presentations of brief light on the response key and brief presentations of food where the light and the food were independently presented. All birds failed to key peck after many light and food presentations, but explicit pairing of the light and food rapidly conditioned pecking to the light. Experiment 2 showed that even when an independent light/food presentation schedule was reduced to variable‐time 30 sec, additional naive birds would not key peck and only one bird pecked when the schedules were variable‐time 15 sec. A third experiment examined an explicit‐unpairing control procedure, where the light and food were not only presented on independent schedules but were also separated by a minimum time, and found that auto‐shaping did not occur. A fourth experiment investigated a number of control procedures and found them ineffective. A fifth experiment investigated the effects of a physical separation of the locus of the response key and the food dispenser, and a sixth experiment investigated using a tone in place of the light. It was concluded that pecking is generated by auto‐shaping procedures only when an intermittently presented keylight is regularly paired with food.