Subcutaneous Fondaparinux versus Intravenous Unfractionated Heparin in the Initial Treatment of Pulmonary Embolism
Top Cited Papers
Open Access
- 29 October 2003
- journal article
- research article
- Published by Massachusetts Medical Society in New England Journal of Medicine
- Vol. 349 (18) , 1695-1702
- https://doi.org/10.1056/nejmoa035451
Abstract
Background The standard initial treatment of hemodynamically stable patients with pulmonary embolism is intravenous unfractionated heparin, requiring laboratory monitoring and hospitalization. Methods We conducted a randomized, open-label trial involving 2213 patients with acute symptomatic pulmonary embolism to compare the efficacy and safety of the synthetic antithrombotic agent fondaparinux with those of unfractionated heparin and to document noninferiority in terms of efficacy. Patients received either fondaparinux (5.0, 7.5, or 10.0 mg in patients weighing less than 50, 50 to 100, or more than 100 kg, respectively) subcutaneously once daily or a continuous intravenous infusion of unfractionated heparin (ratio of the activated partial-thromboplastin time to a control value, 1.5 to 2.5), both given for at least five days and until the use of vitamin K antagonists resulted in an international normalized ratio above 2.0. The primary efficacy outcome was the three-month incidence of the composite end point of symptomatic, recurrent pulmonary embolism (nonfatal or fatal) and new or recurrent deep-vein thrombosis. Results Forty-two of the 1103 patients randomly assigned to receive fondaparinux (3.8 percent) had recurrent thromboembolic events, as compared with 56 of the 1110 patients randomly assigned to receive unfractionated heparin (5.0 percent), for an absolute difference of –1.2 percent in favor of fondaparinux (95 percent confidence interval, –3.0 to 0.5). Major bleeding occurred in 1.3 percent of the patients treated with fondaparinux and 1.1 percent of those treated with unfractionated heparin. Mortality rates at three months were similar in the two groups. Of the patients in the fondaparinux group, 14.5 percent received the drug in part on an outpatient basis. Conclusions Once-daily, subcutaneous administration of fondaparinux without monitoring is at least as effective and is as safe as adjusted-dose, intravenous administration of unfractionated heparin in the initial treatment of hemodynamically stable patients with pulmonary embolism.Keywords
This publication has 20 references indexed in Scilit:
- The Synthetic Pentasaccharide Fondaparinux: First in the Class of Antithrombotic Agents that Selectively Inhibit Coagulation Factor XaSeminars in Thrombosis and Hemostasis, 2002
- Deep-vein thrombosisThe Lancet, 1999
- A Comparison of Low-Molecular-Weight Heparin with Unfractionated Heparin for Acute Pulmonary EmbolismNew England Journal of Medicine, 1997
- Low-Molecular-Weight Heparin in the Treatment of Patients with Venous ThromboembolismNew England Journal of Medicine, 1997
- Treatment of Venous Thrombosis with Intravenous Unfractionated Heparin Administered in the Hospital as Compared with Subcutaneous Low-Molecular-Weight Heparin Administered at HomeNew England Journal of Medicine, 1996
- Heparin-Induced Thrombocytopenia in Patients Treated with Low-Molecular-Weight Heparin or Unfractionated HeparinNew England Journal of Medicine, 1995
- Acenocoumarol and Heparin Compared with Acenocoumarol Alone in the Initial Treatment of Proximal-Vein ThrombosisNew England Journal of Medicine, 1992
- Continuous Intravenous Heparin Compared with Intermittent Subcutaneous Heparin in the Initial Treatment of Proximal-Vein ThrombosisNew England Journal of Medicine, 1986
- Prediction of Creatinine Clearance from Serum CreatinineNephron, 1976
- ANTICOAGULANT DRUGS IN THE TREATMENT OF PULMONARY EMBOLISMThe Lancet, 1960