Reporting a Potential Pandemic
- 1 June 2007
- journal article
- Published by SAGE Publications in Science Communication
- Vol. 28 (4) , 429-454
- https://doi.org/10.1177/1075547007302211
Abstract
While quality mediated information does not guarantee accurate public risk perceptions, it provides the public with the means to construct informed risk assessments. This study analyzed four major U.S. newspapers to assess the quality of coverage related to risks posed by avian flu. “Quality of coverage” was examined with a five-dimension conceptualization that included measures of risk magnitude, self-efficacy, risk comparisons, sensationalism, and thematic and episodic framing. Findings revealed that coverage was dominated by episodic frames, exhibited high sensationalism, and contained minimal information promoting self-efficacy. Conversely, coverage exhibited high quality in terms of risk magnitude and risk comparison information.Keywords
This publication has 18 references indexed in Scilit:
- Pandemic or Not, Experts Welcome Bush Flu PlanScience, 2005
- Connecting News Media Use with Gaps in Knowledge and ParticipationPolitical Communication, 2000
- Media Coverage of Hazard Events: Analyzing the Assumptions*Risk Analysis, 1996
- The Effects of Community Pluralism on Press Coverage of Health Risks from Local Environmental ContaminationRisk Analysis, 1995
- A Longitudinal Study of Agenda Setting for the Issue of Environmental PollutionJournalism & Mass Communication Quarterly, 1995
- Risk Perception and Communication Unplugged: Twenty Years of Process1Risk Analysis, 1995
- The Influence of Mass Media and Interpersonal Communication on Societal and Personal Risk JudgmentsCommunication Research, 1993
- Is Anyone Responsible?Published by University of Chicago Press ,1991
- Perceived Risk, Real Risk: Social Science and the Art of Probabilistic Risk AssessmentScience, 1988
- Reporting on Radiation: A Content Analysis of Chernobyl CoverageJournal of Communication, 1987