Debriefing: Toward a Systematic Assessment of Theory and Practice
- 1 June 1992
- journal article
- research article
- Published by SAGE Publications in Simulation & Gaming
- Vol. 23 (2) , 145-160
- https://doi.org/10.1177/1046878192232003
Abstract
Experiential learning in the educational context incorporates real-life-based processes into the educational setting in order for them to be used and scrutinized The heart of these sorts of learning experiences is the postexperience analytic process, generally referred to as the debriefing session. This essay focuses on the debriefing process as it accompanies one form of experiential learning, simulations and games. It provides a review of the existent literature on debriefing, an analysis of the debriefing process, and effective strategies for its use. It provides an analysis of the process, identifies its components and essential phases, and presents a systematic approach to the assessment of the conduct of debriefing sessions.Keywords
This publication has 17 references indexed in Scilit:
- Developing Self‐awareness through Simulation GamingJournal of Management Development, 1990
- How to Design a Debriefing SessionJournal of Experiential Education, 1986
- Deceiving ourselves about deception: Comment on Smith and Richardson's "Amelioration of deception and harm in psychological research."Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 1985
- DebriefingSimulation & Games, 1984
- Systematic assessment of communication games and simulations: An applied frameworkCommunication Education, 1984
- Amelioration of deception and harm in psychological research: The important role of debriefing.Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 1983
- Instructional Simulation GamingSimulation & Games, 1982
- The effect of debriefing on laboratory induced helplessness: An attributional analysis1Journal of Personality, 1979
- A Procedure for Explaining Experiments Involving DeceptionPersonality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 1976
- Debriefing after psychological experiments: I. Effectiveness of postdeception dehoaxing.American Psychologist, 1976